Don't think someone who 1. Accused me of a position/priority list I didn't have from a single comment 2. Implied I didn't care enough about a big problem because I voiced an opinion about another problem and 3. Switched arguments mid-roll can really accuse anyone else of being peak internet discourse. All that aside, what's even your point here? It's not something i just don't like or approve of, I've stated pretty clearly it's actively harmful. Are you going to argue that they aren't deriving pleasure from other people's pain and suffering, or that this is somehow helping society?

[–] twitter@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

:honk-enraged:

[–] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

dang excellent point. You took an aggressive tone and have yet to correct me on what part of my thinking is wrong, I'm clearly being irrational.

[–] twitter@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

:honk-enraged: Debaaaaaate meeeeee

*also lmao the poster who was just summarily labeling people moral reprobates for the crime of listening to the wrong genre of podcasts is now offended by someone taking an "aggressive tone." Just the biggest karen energy

[–] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago

tell me what I'm getting wrong, what is it you think I'm missing?