62

Very sleek stuff, but reading the analysis gives bad vibes - what is their deal? Trot stuff? Can someone give me a good workup (I'm lazy)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago
[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

Confusingly takes on Epstein seem fine from the briefest of skims

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

CW: SAI don't find it surprising, it's a typical patriarchy enjoyer take to denounce the most egregious sex pests to protect the rest. Only the most unhinged incels will openly call for their right to assault people, but a lot of men are way too comfortable with the kind of culture that enabled Weinstein and Spacey because they - often correctly - have a hunch that they themselves did clearly boundary violating things to their dates in the past and are scared they'll get called out for that.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
62 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13511 readers
1186 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS