52
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

doubt

I think it's a huge stretch to link soil sample info to nuclear weapons, especially when uranium is such a common ballast material in military equipment. I think it actually just makes more sense that Israel is using uraniam counterweights in their bombs, and that's the source of this data.

I also think the article is underselling how straightforward it would be to detect atmospheric use of even very low yield nuclear weapons. There are many nations not aligned with Israel who do space based monitoring of that kind of stuff.

They would obviously use them if they could get away with it.

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even if it really is just uranium counterweights it seems like there will be no investigation until the entity falls. Which is just... great.

rust-darkness

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
52 points (91.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13498 readers
790 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS