this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
13 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It wasn’t so much what she said. It was how she said it.

“Israel has a right to go after the terrorists that are Hamas,” Vice President Kamala Harris told reporters on Aug. 10. It was a standard line, used many, many times by officials seeking to defend Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza.

But watch the video of the moment: Her discomfort is obvious. She raises her hands, palms outward, as if to say, Look. “I mean, Israel has a right …”—and she pauses.

“… to …”—her hands circle in the air, as if she’s searching for adequate words for the situation.

“… go after the terrorists that are Hamas,” she finishes at last. She sounds deeply exasperated. “But,” she adds—and now her hands are clasped, her words fluent—“as I have said many, many times: They also have, I believe, an important responsibility to avoid civilian casualties.”

These are the same words President Joe Biden himself has used many times to condemn civilian deaths, even as his administration has shoveled money to the Israeli war machine and provided diplomatic cover for its leaders. The difference is largely in Harris’ tone.

“Sometimes, it’s the music and not the words,” says Jeremy Ben-Ami, director of the advocacy group J Street, which supports Palestinian self-determination. “I think there’s a real sense that this is not just lip service, but she really means it, and I think that comes across.”

Sadly, the article goes on to say that "subtle signs might not be enough" for people to believe she means the opposite of what she says. "Harris may be singing their tune, but they might not hear her."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is quite a Blue MAGA moment: chuds like to claim they feel what trump-moist actually meant and how it applies to themselves even if it's a ramble about Hannibal Lecter. And now we got... this. contextphobic

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah - David Brooks or Ross Douthat or some other Respectable Conservative had a line that went something like "Trump's supporters take him seriously but not literally; Democrats take him literally but not seriously."

I don't have a similarly symmetrical statement for this one. Chuds hate her for the wrong reasons, leftists hate her for the right reasons, libs love her for made-up reasons, I guess.