this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
115 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13640 readers
698 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I figured some folks would appreciate this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why do traffic-calming infrastructure when you can just give pedestrians bricks? I’m sure this will make incensed motorists act more reasonably.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Until we get the infrastructure, we use the brick.

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I’d prefer ad hoc solutions that don’t involve putting people’s bodies at risk. If we’re willing to carry bricks then I think we should be willing to built bollards.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

building bollards is collective action and we know how easy that is when your city council is owned by real estate developers

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Whoa whoa whoa… I never said to get permission to build them

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

They'll be unbuilt real fast. Can't stop the bricks

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

My body is less at risk if they know I've got a brick, mutually assured destruction works. Source: the lack of nuclear war