this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
146 points (99.3% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
19 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Let's start with where you understand, and we will see where we disagree. My position is history is primarily driven by Material Conditions, ie the status of reality itself and what came before it, and not by individuals moving against the current, so to speak.

As an example, if Karl Marx was born in the year 1200, he would not have had the ideas he does, there would be no conception of Dialectical Materialism from him.

[–] witheyeandclaw@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t disagree so much as I thought you may have been saying this, but wasn’t sure. Thank you for clarifying.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Perfect! Essentially, to wrap it around, the Republican party exists because the conditions for it exist. The idea that we can "vote blue until the Reps are no more, then a left party will take its place" is wrong, because they won't remove the conditions for a fascist party. The new party will be fascist as well, or permadem rule for right wing Dems, like California.