this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
91 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13539 readers
921 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 48 points 1 month ago (10 children)

am i just paranoid or will this make it harder to get evidence of abuse etc. while being presented as a wholesome anti-phone-surveillance thing?

[–] anindefinitearticle@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That's why instead of stickers, we should have lens caps with an easy toggle mechanism.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There's an argument to be made about a lens that is visibly disabled. Good faith and creepers aren't known to overlap

[–] anindefinitearticle@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lens cap visibly disables a lens, while allowing it to be taken off quickly and cleanly in an emergency (e.g. a cop enters).

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i agree, but it's also able to be removed quickly for some creeper shit.

I'm kind of leaning towards the slightly icky position of "people in this club know that photo evidence is not likely to exist"

There are probably still security cameras. You just need to be really good about using them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)