Slop.

what the alternative to a Soviet occupation of eastern Poland was, knowing that Poland, England and France had rejected the preemptive deployment of 1 million soviet soldiers on exchange for a mutual defense agreement, and also failed to join the USSR when it offered to jointly attack Nazi Germany as an alternative to the Munich deals (or Munich betrayal if you're eastern-European)

Soviet liberation of western and eastern Poland. /jk

Also, the land that the USSR took at that time was not even eastern Poland. It was western Ukraine and Belarus that were occupied by Poland at the time. Notably, liberals are fine with said occupation.

Speaking as someone who has been studying Fascism for years, I can’t say that I have ever found the German–Soviet Pact per se to be especially interesting. I am unhappy about it, but what I find much more disturbing are the relationships that various dictatorships of the bourgeoisie had with Berlin in particular:

[Berlin’s] decision to withdraw from the League and the World Disarmament Conference on October 14, 1933, provided further impetus for this move, which resulted in the conclusion of a German–Polish nonaggression pact on January 26, 1934.

Needing Slovakia as a staging ground for war on Poland, Hitler all but gave in, agreeing to a 125,000‐man limit.

“Germany and Russia,” he said, “were two different worlds, especially in their social structure.”** [The Third Reich] had only one ally and partner, and that ally and partner was Italy, he declared. This two‐hour tirade impressed Mussolini.

Albert Speer, [the Chancellor’s] architect and wartime armament minister, would later state that without certain kinds of synthetic fuel made available by U.S. firms, [the Fascist bourgeoisie] “would never have considered invading Poland.” The American historian Bradford Snell agrees; alluding to the controversial rôle played by Swiss banks during the war, he comments that “the Nazis could have attacked Poland and Russia without the Swiss banks, but not without General Motors.”

General Antonescu believed [that the Third Reich] would soon defeat Britain and thus become the sole arbiter over Europe. The conducător asked the führer to send a [Fascist] military mission soon after implementing the Second Vienna Award. He trusted that the presence of [the Wehrmacht] would deter further Soviet demands. He also wanted [Fascist] advisers to train the Romanian Army for a future conflict.

In fact, the Finnish Army and its related services would from the start mobilize a larger proportion (16 percent) of the country’s population than any other European nation at the time. In the morning of 22 June 1941, Hitler made his famous radio speech, in which he declared war on the Soviet Union and mentioned that “the brave Finnish comrades‐in‐arms” would take part in this huge offensive.

Even if I ‘hated’ the Stalin administration (and I do find it disappointing in some respects), I would be far more preoccupied with all of these dictatorships of the bourgeoisie. The only reason to continue overrating the German–Soviet Pact anyway is if you think that it was Moscow’s job to babysit the world. Otherwise, I just don’t get it.

For any of our questioning friends:

It was a non-aggression pact signed to buy time for the USSR to migrate their industry from the border with Poland to deeper in land in the mountains. It was the last non-aggression pact signed with them AFTER every other western nation had already signed one.

It was also only signed after France and the UK refused the USSR's offer of pre-emptively stopping the Nazis from taking Poland. The USSR offered a million troops to pre-emptively invade Germany if France and the UK would agree to it. After France and the UK refused, the non-aggression treaty was signed to buy time, they used this time to create a buffer zone, move all of their industrial factories (concentrated on the border of Poland) into the mountains, and to further industrialise and modernise the army. Moving the factories was critical to the Soviets defeating fascism, had they not have been moved then they would have been taken in the invasion that later occurred.

Here is also an excellent dinner speech from Albert Einstein in which he mentions this pact.

From this post, which is a good read that I highly recommend: https://hexbear.net/post/276014?scrollToComments=false

Come to Poland, we have interwar libel books against Lenin continously published anew as hot stuff X.X

Wasn't he outed as a weird pedo or something?

He still makes videos

Joke's on you if you don't get to enjoy Daddy Hakim's incredibly based materia

I mean, you're right, but his new videos aren't approaching the views that he had when he actually had content.

he's pretty notorious for ideology-hopping

I have a feeling most YouTubers don't believe in anything at all. They just make videos that will fill a niche, and if one of their videos gets ten times more views than the rest, that will become their entire shtick. This is how you get self-described "leftists" like Jimmy Dore cranking out anti-vax videos. You don't need to have a dog in the race. All that matters is the videos are doing numbers, so they keep making them.

Everybody except for the proud racists is looking for content which puts a radical patina on the idea that the Communists are taking things too far.