this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
241 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

22779 readers
12 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

When I see a Ford F-150, I shake my head and think, "loser".

[–] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most trucks, unless specifically single cab or long beds have not been able to carry a 4'x8' sheet of plywood in a decade or longer. A single cab or long bed pick em up truck is as rare as hens teeth. Otherwise they're just pavement princesses who dont haul anything heavier than a gallon of milk or their own sedentary ass. Its all about percieved machismo. And that shit sells trucks to fragile men 8 days a week.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of the most deranged drivers, imo, unless they are contractors and then maybe not but usually still. Any time I see these kinds of trucks in the city I usually prepare myself for the worst.

[–] uSSRI@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

(Contractors are deranged, i watched a coked out contractor have to be restrained from assaulting someone because of a parking spot dispute at 7am)

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Being able to haul 4x8 sheet goods is the measure of a truck for me. And most of them just can't. You know what can? A mid 2010s Honda Odyssey minivan. Fold the back seats down, pull the center row, and load it up. Seats 7 OR hauls drywall? Winner winner, chicken dinner. Not man enough, though, I guess

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They actually can't give birth naturally anymore, every F-150 born today is the result of misuse of jaws of life

[–] buh@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

because of woke they're all conceived with IVF (In Vitro F-150)

In Vitro Fordilization kelly

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Luckily they are now all male

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

grillman Well, it's not like I'd put anything back there and risk scratching my bed liner! So why not use that space for passengers I'll never transport? And this way I can just put everything I need to transport in the cab with me!

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

I want to feel like I’m at home alone on my layzboy with the empty couch behind me

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I guess it's just a matter of time before they start selling a no-bed "truck".

[–] VeryInterestingTable@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Let's not kid ourselves they would sell bedless F150s like fresh croissants to all the mouth breathers.

And I don't mean the Expedition I mean the same but called bedless F150 or F150 Big Cabin Crew.

[–] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that pretty much just an SUV?

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Technically speaking I think it would be a SUT or "sports utility no-bed truck" if you want to get fancy.

Slimy right-wing guys could say "My F-1SUT don't got a bed but it's got a bed - if you know what I'm sayin'."

[–] damnatum_seditiosus@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd love to see the overall height and length of the car over the same years.

[–] principalkohoutek@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Not as much difference as you might think

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The site scales the images so it's not as visually different as it would be otherwise

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How the fuck do you even see anything? Forget being hit by someone else. I'd be more worried about not seeing a downed powerline or a deer.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See, this argument assumes you care about the lives of deer and children

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

I actually think this is true. It often feels like USians treat the problem of pedestrian, especially child, deaths like those parents of the kid that died from measles.

[–] ptc075@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not sure I agree. The 1976 regular cab you linked is 16 foot 5 inches.

The modern regular cab you linked is 17 foot, 5 inches.

But that's not what the original image is checking. If we also check the current SuperCrew+ShortBed, that one is 19 foot, 4 inches.

So yeah, trucks are 3 feet longer and yet have less cargo room in the bed.

(And yes, TY for finding the links!)

Thanks a lot for the research that I should have done!

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This brought back a core memory of going on fishing trips in a pickup like the middle one as a kid with my dad and brother (this was before I went vegan, and even then, it was mostly an excuse to relax on a boat for me). The back had these side-facing fold-out seats, and I'd sit in one of those, listening to Metallica or Black Sabbath on a CD player while I watched the woods roll by.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My mom had a black Toyota and the "jump seats" were super cramped even for twelve year old me, still I remember playing gameboy in one, with one of those flashlight/magnifying glass attachments.

[–] spudnik@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Me too! I remember taking turns on playing pokemon yellow with my buddy, facing each other for 4 hours on a road trip

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

I hated the jump seats. I always had to sit on them because my younger brother had "longer legs" and so "needed" the front seat. Never mind that he'd push the seat all the way back so I had no shoulder or hip room. At least I hadn't yet developed motion sickness.

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For me it was the second from the left and either riding in the bed or standing between my dad and brother on the bench seat

Brings me back to riding around with my grandpa in his early 70's model; sometimes he would have to pick me up on the way home from hauling firewood. I don't remember if that was an F-150 or an F-250, but it had the big front bench seat and the steering console-mounted 3-speed manual transmission.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

If they would make a new 50-60% bed, barebones, 4 cylinder, manual transmission compact pickup I would buy it today. The only luxuries I expect are abs, power brakes, power steering, airbags, and an air conditioner. I've heard a lot of nonsense about cafe standards and cost/profit per unit but I still cant believe its not profitable to make this little truck.

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

They could never sell a K truck at as high a margin as s suburban commuter truck.

So every dollar they spend making x profit on k trucke is not a dollar they are spending time make X+ dollars. As such the line risks not going up as much. Avoiding that risk is worth more than money to a business

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Bring back the old Chevy S-10's and Ford Rangers from the 90's/early 2000's! They handled like shit in the snow even with a bed full of sandbags but they were fun as hell to drive.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 0 points 1 week ago

I've heard a lot of nonsense about cafe standards and cost/profit per unit but I still cant believe its not profitable to make this little truck.

It most likely isn't legal due to safety standards as they relate to inhabitants of cars. Minimum windows heights, minimum crumple zones, a shitload of airbags every which direction, at this point probably a whole lot of sensors you wouldn't really need for that kind of car, list goes on.

[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

I hate this so much. My job recently retired two 2012 chevy colorado’s. They had four doors, small frame, but plenty of bed space. The best we could do for a replacement is a ford maverick. the maverick has more room in the cab and lots of useful new features but the bed is absolutely pitiful. Just to fit all the things we need for work we have to use this little gate that folds out and adds the tailgate to the bed space. It works sure but it feels pretty unsafe, the backup camera becomes useless and there’s just a could fence posts and a coupe bars between anything slipping out of the bed on the highway.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

similar bed size as this cute little guy

[–] jack@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

This may be a small breed, but it's actually extremely healthy, hard-working, and long-lived.

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

The change from '97 onwards I believe is because the F150 and Expedition use the same chassis.

[–] autism_2@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one want to work anymore

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Ugly cars from an ugly company

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

This is what they took from you.

[–] buttwater@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

I rode in a coworker's new Tundra, the full size 4 door big as fuck one. They're awful to share the road with and I don't like them but it's a really pleasant ride. Being tall gives you good visibility, they have huge powerful engines, and modern technology makes them feel tame and convenient (cameras, sensors etc). You can fit a load of people in the front and a load of their crap in the back. Unfortunately a truck in suburban America works great as a default vehicle. It's a damn shame this is what they've become instead of trimmed down and efficient utilitarian vehicles. I guess that would be the Maverick, which is pretty great new trucklet

[–] sparkosthenes@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

They used to be for doing stuff with, now they're for saying "Hey look everyone, I do stuff!" while burning a bucket of gas every mile...

[–] picklemeister@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

amazing, the average modern f150 crew cab bed is slightly smaller than or roughly the same size as my el Camino’s, depending on if they spring for the 6.5 footer. my novelty car is more of a truck than Joe bob’s masculinity totem

[–] ptc075@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are all those trucks really the exact same length? I was under the impression that they get longer every gen.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

I think the image is proportionally scaling

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Why the change to dual cab for the last one? Not really a fair comparison