215
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by star_wraith@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

And you know who I also don’t condemn?

The IRA

The Viet Minh

John Brown

Haitian slaves who revolted

Native American fighters

Black Panthers

National Liberation Front (Algeria)

Nelson Mandela

The 26th of July Movement

Every one of them were called “terrorists” or something equivalent at some point. Now think about who’s on the opposite of this list. Apartied South Africa, slavers, settlers, Zionists, the US government… There is only one moral and just side to be on and it’s not even a discussion.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 116 points 1 year ago

Nelson Mandela is a good historical figure to bring up in this context. Liberals love him for his rehabilitated image as a peace negotiator, but he didn’t go to prison for writing letters to the editor.

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 65 points 1 year ago

They love crowing on about Nelson Mandela in prison but always without a single murmur about what he was unjustly imprisoned for

thinkin-lenin

[-] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

I exposed one Redditor as a collaborator during the Apartheid in South Africa because I immediately went for the carotid artery with the "historical context"

[-] mar_k@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Nelson Mandela was literally considered a terrorist by the US government until 2008

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

If they had any integrity they still would.

They repeatedly offered to release him from jail in exchange for denouncing socialism. He did no such thing. He also reached a point where he refused to condemn violent rebellion because the non-violence wasn’t getting the goods. What liberals unknowingly worship him for, in their civility fetishism, is his acts of public reconciliation with the colonizers. Would have been good to get that post-apartheid wealth redistribution instead but what’s done is done.

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

The lesson is, and always will be, to get the goods first.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

unarmed Palestinians did peaceful Great March of Return throughout 2018 and were cut down in the thousands by IOF snipers who were having competitions to see how many people they could maim

so done with this historically ignorant moralizing shit about nonviolence from liberals

[-] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 year ago

peaceful protest? yeah hooray let me march with you haha

UH ERM VIOLENCE? THAT’S NOT THE RIGHT WAY TO GET THINGS DONE !!!!1!!!1

all it takes to piss off a liberal is telling them that actual real change doesn’t happen with signing petitions and holding hands. no government gives a single shit or fuck about your lip service and will continue to steamroll oppressed groups regardless

[-] asg101@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

UH ERM VIOLENCE? THAT’S NOT THE RIGHT WAY TO GET THINGS DONE !!!!1!!!1

They all just need to vote harder!

[-] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

wooooooow bro come on man dude look are you saying people shouldn’t vote at all? wow bro seriously man damn

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

vote harder

yeah - kinetically.

I kinetically vote to remove fash from my local area fash-bash

[-] Yurt_Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

Because liberals don't actually care about what happens to oppressed groups they just want to feel morally superior while never being effected by the conditions of the system they support.

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

I’d like to hear someone go full cheeky on the “condemn hamas” thing and be all “well actually Hamas had good intelligence that the IDF was embedded with those concertgoers so that was just collateral damage.”

[-] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

The IDF was using those concertgoers as human shields.

[-] ratboy@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate the framing of Hamas as terrorists, if they are considered terrorists, The IOF should be too.

I was reading the 1988 charter and there are parts of it that are sketchy and contain anti semitic stuff, like saying that Jews control the world and media and that they use groups like the Freemasons to push the Zionist agenda. I think there is one quote about killing jews. But in the same charter they talk about aoming for Muslims, Christians and Jews to live peacefully together as they had after the Islamic conquest in the 7th century. And I recognize that the formation of Hamas is a reaction to colonization, displacement, murder and torture. Also I know they did re-write the charter in 2017 to explicitly state that they are militantly against the Zionist occupation and not Jews. It's interesting and evokes a lot of different conflicting feelings for me, I just would be super curious to see an interview with someone who has been part of Hamas for decades speak on this

Edit: I'm working on a very brief history of Palestine and I'm finally working on 1988-1995 so there is probably a lot of context I'm missing at this point in the history too and am really curious to keep moving forward and learn about it.

[-] stigsbandit34z@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately all of these groups/people (besides Mandela) are the “bad guys” according to most normies angery

[-] LeZero@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And even Mandela got dirty looks from some liberals, on account of his sin of marxism

[-] atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

this is freaky, just today i was thinking the same thing.

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago
[-] Self_Hating_Moid@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Unlimited genocide upon the israeli colonial state

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago
[-] birdcat@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I see where you're going but I actually really don't see HAMAS as a legit liberation movement, what they do is terrorism and I don't know anything anymore. and I think it doesn't matter.

protest nonviolent = be called a terrorist, continue living under apartheid , get murdered, tortured, terrorized and abused daily.

protest violent = be called a terrorist and continue living under apartheid and being murdered , tortured, terrorized and abused daily.

protest with terrorist tactics = be called a terrorist, face genocide.

this whole mess fucks me up so much, I don't know how to live anymore. I know terrible things happen all the time and the world looks away, but this time it is different. I lost my will lo live on this planet. what is to be gained to be on the 'correct side', when humanity as a whole is failing and failing and failing again.

edit; hey, thanks for the replies, i'm sorry, i lack the energy to respond; as i said, i dont know anything and think it's all irrelevant.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

FYI, it makes a lot more sense to ditch the “terrorism” framing. Paraphrasing a news mega poster, the jet plane pilot bombing civilians is never called a terrorist, it’s a definition exclusively used against insurgent resistance.

Are Hamas a militant Islamic fundamentalist group? Now that’s true, and that’s worth having reservations about personally endorsing. However, at this point in time, the united front of Palestinian resistance is unified in support of armed struggle against occupation (a tactic that is, incidentally, legal under international law), and Hamas is part of that front.

Nobody is required to endorse all tactics and ideologies found within the Palestinian resistance. A way to frame it that may bring you peace is that the only way to gain ultimate freedom for their people is with violence. As you yourself recognize, the path of negotiation (Oslo) and peaceful protests (the Marches of Return) have only led to further encroachment and oppression.

So while it is tough to see innocents caught in the crossfire, there’s no such thing as halfway liberation. There is only the boot on the neck of the Palestinians, until there is enough combined force to lift it off

[-] caballeroAguila@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Thank you for putting it that way. Your words really helped ease my mind a bit about this situation.

[-] star_wraith@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mate I can see you’re genuinely working through this, so I’ll just say a couple things:

It’s not like Palestine can put together a formal army, then meet the IOF on the field of battle in formation, following the Queensbury rules or whatever. They are staring down genocide. To me, everything is fair game. Civilians dying is tragic, absolutely. But the blame there is on Israel, not Hamas.

Hamas isn’t perfect - I don’t care for the more hardline religious aspects ofc - but right now they are the only ones in Gaza who can mobilize an armed resistance. That’s why the PFLP and DFLP (who I definitely support) also support Hamas. Same thinking as to why Mao allied with his enemies the KMT when Japan invaded. Gotta make some uncomfortable alliances. Hang together or hang separately.

Stick around Hexbear and I think you’ll see how we work through these issues too.

Things are tough right now, no doubt. But I like something Felix tweeted recently (@byyourlogic on twitter):

Palestinians have resolve and grace the likes of which you and I have never had to tap into. don’t just stew in despair, because they haven’t done that in these 75 years.---

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

yeah better to just let them get trampled hey.

The Palestinian resistance is alive and well. You and your support for them ought to be too.

[-] birdcat@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

but how? posting memes and arguing online is no help. what do do? seriously, I would be ready to volunteer as a human shield at this point.

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

What do you mean by "human shield"? Are you seriously buying into the western media's spin doctoring of Palestinian children killed in airstrikes deliberately targeting civilians as "human shields"?

Volunteer at your local pro Palestine org, donate to Palestine relief foundations, boycott Israeli products, join Pro Palestine protests that are occuring around you. Anything but being a whiny smartass liberal in response to pro Palestine sentiment.

[-] birdcat@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah going to work for the Red Cross in Palestine is something you can do.

In the absence of a mass party line on what to do. It's up to our own creativity, to answer the question: "If I was alive when the Nazis were doing their genocide, what could I have done to oppose them?"

Because we are living in such a time, Israel is an enemy that must be opposed in a similar way.

I see where you're going but I actually really don't see HAMAS as a legit liberation movement

If I may engage in good faith, why do you believe this to be the case?

[-] Orannis62@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

What's the difference in your mind between violent protest and terrorism?

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
215 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13507 readers
1315 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS