94

https://raddle.me/wiki/leftunity

Some choice quotes straight from the US state department

The USSR alone was responsible for the de-Tatarization of Crimea, the genocide of the Ingrian Finns, the ethnic cleansing of Poles, the mass gulaging and pogroms of Greeks, the deportation of the Karachays, the deportation of the Kalmyks, the deportation of the Chechens and Ingush (Aardakh), the deportation of the Balkars, the deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia, the deportation of the Meskhetian Turks, the deportations of the Chinese and Koreans, the execution and deportation of Latvians, the expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe and the Holodomor famine that largely happened due to the USSR's confiscation and export of all the grain stores in central and eastern Ukraine, and preventing people from acquiring more food by banning free movement. Then there's communist Czechoslovakia's Romani sterilizations, the Cambodian genocide, Bulgaria's "revival process", Vietnam's Montagnard persecution, the Isaaq genocide in Somalia, the Hmong genocide in Laos, the Gukurahundi massacres in Zimbabwe and the mass starvation of anywhere between 15 and 55 million people that happened in China during Mao's "Great Leap Forward".

LMAO

Marx really made his career shamelessly ripping off Proudhon's earlier work point by point, but piling on a thick authority sludge before serving it up to the world as if he were presenting something new and not just an authoritarian perversion of Proudhon's ideas. Once Marx found fame with his plagiarism, he then decried Proudhon as being detestable; a bad economist, a bad philosopher, whose critiques were worthless and unevolved.

MARX STOLE COMMUNISM FROM ANARCHISTS!!! LOL

identifying as a leftist is a statement to the world that you support nationalism, states, borders, a monopoly on violence, being ruled by kings or presidents or central committees. Anarchists aren't left or right wing, we're anarchists. We reject the power machinations of both wings of government. We reject all authority.

LITERALLY A LIBERTARIAN

If the concept of community is authority-based e.g. steeped in majoritarianism, then what good is it to anarchists? Since at least 99.9% of all existing self-identifying communities and even theoretical proposals for communities are beholden to states, councils, committees, voter bodies and other forms of rulership, it's safe to say the community ideal in itself is just another vessel of authority. If all organized communities on the planet can be clearly demonstrated to be authority-based, then it's a safe bet that the entire concept of community is authority-forming... By simply looking at every example in the world today, you can bet with absolute certainty that any forced grouping of people around the community ideal is going to lead everyone involved through another abusive and torturous adventure in archy.

Anti...COMMUNITY??? Can't make this shit up omg.

The few remaining free people in the world e.g. the Hadza in east Africa ("Tanzania") don't live in anything resembling what we know as a community. They're nomadic, have no leaders, no gods, no rules, no crops, no property, no marriage, no parents (Hadza children have full autonomy and essentially raise themselves), don't extract anything from the land other than foraged food and are quick to remove themselves from the presence of anyone who tries to rule them.

PLEASE LET ME GO MONKE, I HATE HUMANS SO MUCH

The original National Bolsheviks in both Russia and Germany had the same idea, believing socialism needed more blatant nationalism and racism than it already had under Lenin and Stalin. In the 1980s, the concept of third positionism was taken up by the far-right, fascist political party National Front in the United Kingdom. Today there has been a resurgence in third positionist fascism under various labels, from modern nazbols to "national anarchism" to neo-Eurasianism to (I argue) Dengism. It's completely unsurprising that an ideology founded by virulent racist and colonialist paternalists like Marx and Engels would find support with so many racist nationalists.

Fucker is trying to cancel Marx using literal nazi propaganda ROFL

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 69 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What is it with liberals thinking ideas are possessions? Back in the 2016 election I was told sneeringly more than once that Sanders didn't even invent medicare for all, ackshully it was some other senator. Who cares where Marx or Sanders got their ideas? This isn't a science fair, it's not a homework assignment. Fucking liberals

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 60 points 11 months ago

Imagine being an anarchist and believing in intellectual property lmao

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 48 points 11 months ago

What no dialectics does to a mfer.

Every single idea/concept/knowledge/etc is the result of a historic process, where people build up on the work of people before them and so on.

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago

medicare for all is also just a shitty middle ground measure

just do a national health service

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago

Private ownership brainworms

[-] CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

This isn't a science fair,

Imagine going up to kids at a science fair and giving them Fs for not doing totally independent novel research.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Budwig_v_1337hoven@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

idea theft is bad because it's property

[-] ksynwa_from_lemmygrad@hexbear.net 48 points 11 months ago

no parents (Hadza children have full autonomy and essentially raise themselves)

It is all about bedtimes

[-] NPa@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

dunno, seeing as they made so many references to libertarianism it might be something else... libertarian-approaching

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The anti-community rhetoric screams that they’ve conflated actual community (which the Hadza most certainly have) with the reactionary use of “community” as a veil for insular xenophobia.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago

If the concept of community is authority-based e.g. steeped in majoritarianism, then what good is it to anarchists? Since at least 99.9% of all existing self-identifying communities and even theoretical proposals for communities are beholden to states, councils, committees, voter bodies and other forms of rulership, it's safe to say the community ideal in itself is just another vessel of authority. If all organized communities on the planet can be clearly demonstrated to be authority-based, then it's a safe bet that the entire concept of community is authority-forming... By simply looking at every example in the world today, you can bet with absolute certainty that any forced grouping of people around the community ideal is going to lead everyone involved through another abusive and torturous adventure in archy.

Idiot has failed to understand that anarchism is not anti-authority.

This is what happens when you misinterpret anarchism and turn yourself into a vulgar anti-authoritarian instead of an anarchist. They anti-anarchy in their obsession with anti-authoritarianism. They hate authority so much they want ultra hyper atomisation and ultra individualism to the extent of utter obliteration of all community, social or otherwise. Why? Because you literally can't have basic human interactions without some sort of expected etiquette, expected norms that people conform to, and expected behaviours that people tell you off for if you break them. It's how human social relations work. The only way to escape all authority is to not live in groups and the desire this person has to live like that suggests they are a deeply misanthropic person.

The few remaining free people in the world e.g. the Hadza in east Africa ("Tanzania") don't live in anything resembling what we know as a community. They're nomadic, have no leaders, no gods, no rules, no crops, no property, no marriage, no parents (Hadza children have full autonomy and essentially raise themselves), don't extract anything from the land other than foraged food and are quick to remove themselves from the presence of anyone who tries to rule them.

This is really really not accurate. The social hierarchy among the hadza is age based, like most tribal arrangements, with elders being respected as teachers.

Anyway how exactly is Ziq expecting to get to this kind of lifestyle with the population we currently have other than through mass starvation and/or murder through intentionally breaking down the structures that currently exist for the current population.

the expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe

Oh yes. The nazis. Cool. Glad I wasted my time before rereading and catching this fascist supporting shit.

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 11 months ago

The only way to escape all authority is to not live in groups and the desire this person has to live like that suggests they are a deeply misanthropic person.

Taking a peek at the thread someone linked in another comment further supports your conclusion:

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 11 months ago

I really do feel sorry for this person. They're stuck in that edgy 14 year old "everyone hates me" mentality. Friendless, alone, pretending that they hate people because they're so lacking in social skills that they can't ever connect with anyone.

I imagine though, if I met them in real life I would be filled with less "pity" and more of the "violent rage" they describe (though I think they're just misidentifying contempt as rage there).

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago

Purging chuds, strongly encouraging underdeveloped people to do better, and upholding the advanced as exemplary is the same thing as ritual sacrifice and keeping "the rank and file" in line.

Man, if you think that banning fuckwits amounts to the ritualistic killing of people then you need to log off. The only ritualistic killing going on in social media spaces is when ziq ritualistically "killed" their administrator privileges for gross violations of trust before promptly resuming their position as administrator on raddle.

Also note that anarchists enforce community norms in effectively the same way - if you violate anti-oppressive values then you either get "ritually sacrificed" or the community enforces accountability processes to get people to sort their shit out. This isn't evidence of the deep-seated malicious nature of tankies, this is just how communities—all communites—operate and balance the competing demands of negative and positive liberties.

In that same comment thread ziq is playing victim by heavily implying that their life is being threatened by words and inference. Grow the fuck up, please.

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago

These ultra-individualist types amuse me because they're more or less tacitly stating to the world that they're cowards. They exalt the individual over the collective, so the idea that anyone would care about someone or something more than themselves to the point of sacrificing their life for that someone or something is unfathomable. But someone who would never risk their life for the sake of anything other than themselves is nothing more than a self-interested coward. And self-interested cowards aren't exactly known for being mentally and emotionally resilient who won't completely cave under the slightest of pressure.

And this isn't even getting to the sock puppets, an absolutely pathetic but predictable behavior of a emotionally stunted person.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 35 points 11 months ago

Ah, I'm very familiar with the return to monke crowd I think.

I used to listen to a pretty good podcast, Ashes Ashes (https://ashesashes.org/). Episodes would cover some aspect of modern life and, while citing quality sources, detail how that aspect of modern life is unsustainable, dependent on fragile supply chaings, and/or unable to survive climate change. It's a good pod, 107 episodes, worth listening to, but pretty fucking grim at times.

Anyway, they had a discord server and I hung out a lot there while leaving reddit & twitter but before finding chapo.chat. It was full of terminally online "anarchists" and one occaisional visitor who would always stir shit up & definitely belongs here (Enoch, where are you?).

"Return to monke" memes were really popular there.

UlyssesT actually REALLY reminds me of the most active user on that server, in style not in content. The guy was really into Max Stirner and Egoism. He was an egoist anarchist. very weird. The only reason he wasn't anprim was because he needed insulin and knew that primitivism would hurt him, personally.

[-] saladpresser@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

Thank Marx you found hexbear before they indoctrinated you into their death cult <3

[-] Timberknave@hexbear.net 34 points 11 months ago

the expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe

weird-bolshevik

[-] saladpresser@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago

Muh poor innocent nazis lol

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

I must assume they mean the ethnic Germans of the Volga region, which Lenin established and Stalin dissolved on the advice of Beria and Molotov, relocating many of its inhabitants eastward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] The_Walkening@hexbear.net 34 points 11 months ago

The proud libertarian who can't read, gets aggressive with mirrors, and fucks family members.

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 35 points 11 months ago

Claims to be an egoist, but functions entirely on id

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago

ziq deserves no attention

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ziq has a lot to say about genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Let's hear what they have to say about ethnic Germans in the Ukraine, especially Mennonites, and how they were treated by anarchists.

Let's hear what they have to say about the genocidal actions against Catholics in Catalonia.

Let's hear what they have to say about the Spanish anarchists who supported the Spanish colonial holdings in Morocco and the genocidal actions that were necessary to suppress Moroccan uprisings that threatened the colonial domination?

What's that? They're all out of breath from denouncing what the tankies did in history that they didn't manage to get around to denouncing what anarchists did in history? Goodness gracious!

There's three ways that this always proceeds, in my experience:

  • Open genocide denialism

  • Rules-lawyering genocide

  • "Actually I denounce all of those examples of genocide carried out by anarchists (it's just that I don't ever talk about it, strangely enough) but you are making an unfair generalisation by holding me personally accountable for the actions of historical anarchism which I do not support"-style hypocritical anarchistier-than-thou nuance-cuck nonsense

[-] blakeus12@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

Hodza children have full autonomy

this literally all is just "Ugh, Mom!!! I don't want to go to bed at 10:30!!! YOU'RE THE WORST!!!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago

Vietnam's Montagnard persecution

I'm sure the person using the archaic French colonial label for them cares very much about the persecution of the đồng bào.

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

Don't the Hazda people that still live exclusively through foraging and hunting have a life expectancy in the mid 30s, and an infant mortality rate above 20 percent? And don't the majority of Hazda people live with some forms of modern lifestyle? Last I read, of the 1300 Hazda people in Tanzania, only 300-400 are exclusively hunter gatherers.

[-] saladpresser@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

Of course, ecofascists want everyone to die in their 30s. They literally write fanfic where 99% of humanity dies and the survivors live in caves lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

monkeys aren't sinophobic

[-] sharkfucker420@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago

I really truly believe reducing a political sect to "they just silly naive kids who believe in a utopia" is very short sighted. It's done to us communist as well literally all of the time so why would you think it's a smart idea to reduce some other sect to the same label?

[-] saladpresser@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's a stretch calling primitivism a utopia. They want to kill almost everyone so they can forage for berries where our cities used to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago

Why do NATO leftists have such a strong need to be labelled as leftists while being anything but? It's always them doing this shit and calling themselves Trotskyists or Anarchists while doing so. They aren't happy just being liberals. They have to be some kind of radical when the only thing radical they have going are some social justice issues that only put them to the left of mouth-breathing conservatives.

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

We have Chomsky at home.

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

Sinophobe

God dammit I knew we shouldn't have sent him to the West to get sutras.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] saladpresser@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 11 months ago

I have stolen their meme.

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

Other than my first knee-jerk instinct to say "who" and "cringe" my barest surface reading of this fella is that of a post-left primitivist, which is simply word salad for being a bandit, robber and criminal. I have yet to come across one of these people not bragging about stealing or destroying the personal property of their fellow man or outright attacking and robbing people they think deserve it ( surprise, they usually don't. But its kinda funny the very rare times they jump a neo-Nazi)

I have zero hesitation to take these people out into the woods, far from civilization, and show them Alaskan native style hunting.

Thankfully, primitivists don't want to live somewhere they'd die from exposure or die from getting stomped on by the wildlife, or die from eating poisonous berries a la the Christopher McCandless technique.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
94 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15908 readers
497 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS