133
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Previous Hexbear post on this issue by @ButtBidet@hexbear.net

https://hexbear.net/post/3259169

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 71 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sorry for causing this.

Also holy fuck if someone says "obligate carnivore" to me one more fucking time I am going to reach through the screen and suffocate them by stuffing a head of cauliflower down their throats.

Anyway, one reading of this TOS update bans discussions of meat eating as it advocates immanent harm and is an unhealthy diet.

[-] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt any of the people yelling obligate carnivore like it's an incantation to banish vegans actually know what it means.

[-] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 35 points 2 weeks ago

You should have more faith in yourself. I am certain they don't

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

~~The wrong person is apologising here. You did nothing wrong.~~ (lol I misread what you wrote)

Also I have zero interest in non-vegan's opinions on vegan matters. If someone knowingly and calmly get involved in the industrial murder and exploitation of animals, everything they say about the issue is just concern trolling. It's like the millions of carnist Westerners who hold strong opinions on PETA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 70 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not going to weigh in on pets particularly because I don't know enough, I'm also not vegan. I do however want to remark that you can sense the meat eating guilt and reactionary emotional defensiveness in a lot of this stuff. People feel very attacked and very defensive.

There is an underlying feeling deep down that it is wrong but because they personally enjoy it and get happy hormones when eating the topic triggers a massive emotional response.

Speculation: Eating food is probably one of the only times some people truly genuinely feel happy and is responsible for the massive defensive reaction when anyone suggests food habits should be changed. I suspect that the non-vegans that do not react poorly to the topic have much stronger sources of happiness that aren't food.

[-] 12022081631@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

that line of speculation is super compelling. thanks for sharing. I have had to have a lot of conversations with people about why others have such strong personal feelings about their eating habits and this speculation honestly fills in some of the gaps

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

Eating food is probably one of the only times some people truly genuinely feel happy

ha ha side-eye-2

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not going to weigh in on pets particularly because I don't know enough, I'm also not vegan.

I wish more people did this about things

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] destroyamerica@lemmygrad.ml 66 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

this will absolutely be used to go after socialists on that instance (if there are even any remaining after everything .world has done lol)

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 65 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

@Linkerbaan

-31•

We reserve the right to remove information that could cause imminent physical harm to any living being. This includes topics like conversion therapy, unhealthy diets, and dangerous medical procedures. Information that could result in imminent physical harm to property or other living beings may also be removed.

And people pointing out the Democrats are complicit in Genocide apparently.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 68 points 2 weeks ago

physical harm to property

bootlicker

You can't harm property, fuckheads

[-] PointAndClique@hexbear.net 58 points 2 weeks ago

Also

property or other living being

Property isn't alive

[-] m532@hexbear.net 40 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the LW admins are slaveowners

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

I was thinking they just wanted to fuck the Eiffel Tower

I think your take is unfortunately more likely

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

Well they want to emulate spez in every other way, so

[-] booty@hexbear.net 32 points 2 weeks ago
[-] EpicKebabEater@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

I think they're still butthurt about the fact that pets can go vegan and call pets "property".

[-] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 2 weeks ago

Worse yet when they justify harming people in the name of protecting private property.

When they're finished licking boots, it's time to lick the wall.

[-] destroyamerica@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 2 weeks ago

that user is the most stubborn person I've ever seen, every time I've ever seen them they're getting downvoted and being lied about shout out to them lol

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Inui@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

Linkerbaan is god's chosen soldier, destined to preach among those who hate them so that their souls may some day be saved. fidel-salute-big

[-] lil_tank@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

Medium credibility??? I mean, sure for us that's true but for libs The Guardian has transcended reality and provides only the tuthest of all truths

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

From a mod:

Israel has been committing war crimes in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria for DECADES before Biden and Harris held political office. They are not to blame here, Israel is. Bibi is. Their crimes will continue regardless of support from the US or who is President.

Blame the actual perpetrators, not those you imagine are involved via six degrees of separation.

critical thinking is officially banned on .world data-laughing

[-] WorkingClassCorpse@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

I saw an exchange yesterday where a lib was insisting the US is responsible for Israel's genocide in the same way that Sweden is responsible for the Columbine shooting because the gun used was manufactured there.

That exchange actually broke me

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] destroyamerica@lemmygrad.ml 60 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

holy fuck some moron used chat gpt to try and be anti-vegan good god https://lemmy.world/comment/12033479

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 55 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Antiwork@hexbear.net 47 points 2 weeks ago
[-] PointAndClique@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago
[-] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

both

both

both is good

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

imagine wasting your time and fragile ego on this fucking nonsense lmao

world.mins writing a 20 paragraph legaleese document ensuring no vegan will ever touch them in there safe space ever again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 41 points 2 weeks ago

Rooki is the same admin forcing the MBFC bot on every news post.

They refuse to listen to the community. Their way or the highway.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

Who needs fed when you got admins like this? Probably still a fedposting

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh man this ones got some flavour to sink ones teeth into 😅

I take the side of the admin. If someone can’t accept or understand that a cat eats a meat based diet then they deserve to have reality thrown in their face. Better than some poor animals being tortured.

Im tempted to make a world account just to ram my face into this thread in particular. Just no thoughts in this persons head other thanberdly-smug. Information justs slides right off like a tab of butter on a slide during a hot summer afternoon.

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I believe this study. It’s true that vegans say their vegan cats are healthier than other cats.

no-mouth-must-scream

[-] Inui@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Vegan cats being the thing that tears .world apart is really funny because I've seen it irl and wouldn't be surprised if ya'll already had that struggle session here.

Not trying to start that debate here if not, but among most vegan groups I've been part of, many people had cats for years before adopting a vegan lifestyle in every other way, so it becomes a "don't ask, don't tell" situation. Otherwise, you get into endless arguments about how the cat havers aren't really vegan. But the non-cat havers offer no real individual solutions and just tip toe around the idea that the cat haver should kill them to balance out the moral calculus, or give them to someone else to wash their hands of the issue while not materially affecting anything.

If you ever want to destroy a vegan community, ask if you should feed your cat a vegan diet or more generally about taking care of meat-eating animals at all.

Doubly funny, in an absurd way, is that .world will so fiercely advocate for their kitties, but ignore the deaths of humans that their favorite politicians are causing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

plus it was done by a pro vegan group

It was done by a uni. Fuck off, shit.just.works poster.

Guy (not OP, I mean the one from .world), fucking read the lit review. The unhealthiness of vegan cat food is based on vibes, not published evidence. There's also a lot of back research that vegan cat food is fine, it's not just this one study. Again, READ THE FUCKING STUDUY.

[-] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284132

To study health outcomes in cats fed vegan diets compared to those fed meat, we surveyed 1,418 cat guardians, asking about one cat living with them, for at least one year. Among 1,380 respondents involved in cat diet decision-making, health and nutrition was the factor considered most important. 1,369 respondents provided information relating to a single cat fed a meat-based (1,242–91%) or vegan (127–9%) diet for at least a year. We examined seven general indicators of illness. After controlling for age, sex, neutering status and primary location via regression models, the following risk reductions were associated with a vegan diet for average cats: increased veterinary visits– 7.3% reduction, medication use– 14.9% reduction, progression onto therapeutic diet– 54.7% reduction, reported veterinary assessment of being unwell– 3.6% reduction, reported veterinary assessment of more severe illness– 7.6% reduction, guardian opinion of more severe illness– 22.8% reduction. Additionally, the number of health disorders per unwell cat decreased by 15.5%. No reductions were statistically significant. We also examined the prevalence of 22 specific health disorders, using reported veterinary assessments. Forty two percent of cats fed meat, and 37% of those fed vegan diets suffered from at least one disorder. Of these 22 disorders, 15 were most common in cats fed meat, and seven in cats fed vegan diets. Only one difference was statistically significant. Considering these results overall, cats fed vegan diets tended to be healthier than cats fed meat-based diets. This trend was clear and consistent.

Not to be a stick in the mud here, but... what? How on earth does "cats fed vegan diets tended to be healthier than cats fed meat-based diets" follow after "considering these results overall"? You mean the results that weren't statistically significant? Those results? And that one statistically significant disease difference? It was for kidney problems, and the vegan cats had more problems than the non-vegan ones (table 6).

If there's a case for feeding cats a vegan diet, this ain't it.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The biggest issue with Reddit and Facebook was that they let stuff like this stick around it and eventually consume it.

It’s a good policy imho, and I’m happy to see it

Science should prevail

agony-wholesome

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because the priority for them is engagement, regardless of how harmful the content could be to people. Engagement doesn’t mean shit here because nobody’s profiting off of it.

Am I really hearing this shit from a .world user? agony-shivering

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago

@Rose 3•

As noted in my post on the “moderation incident”, by adding more subjectivity to the rules, you are opening the door to even more instance moderator misconduct. There is already evidence of how that would go.

Rooki felt it right to intervene in the !vegan cat food thread (and got a pat on the back with the new rules made to justify their actions), then not only took no issue with comments like “Meat is not something diabetics need to worry about.” but also fueled the fire in the same thread by saying “To be honest linking something like meat to death of people is like saying everybody that breathed air died.”

So much for taking action against harmful dietary advice.

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That post is wild just carnist after carnist whining

Bewildered Carnist"What the fuck is “vegan cat food”? I sometimes can’t understand people."

"Ok. I get it. As people, we are bad. We mass husbandry just for food, modifying them with artificial selection for productivity. So I can understand veganism (although I am not vegan)."

"But have we really reached the point where we stop animals from eating meat? Either I’m a bigoted idiot or people are out of their minds." speech-r qconfusion

Brave Poster"For me, the purpose of the post is exactly what it asks for. I don’t think I’ve ever posted to !vegan except for today, to cross-post the OP, but my own fate as an active lemmy.world user likely rests on the outcome of this request. I run a tiny community that has no relation to animal rights or ethics but I feel it is absolutely threatened when there are moderators like Rooki that act based on their views rather than the rules."

madeline-deadpan

Smug Carnist"That vegan community has a rule against misinformation. The idea that a cat is perfectly healthy on a vegan diet is misinformation. You feel threatened by mods like Rooki who act based on rules rather than your views. You’d rather mistreat animals than admit that anything any vegan has ever said ever might be wrong, and not allow anyone to point out that your wrong." speech-rdebate-me-debate-me
::: spoiler Concern troll Carnist People are out of their minds. It’s a cult. Thankfully, mostly constrained to the west. speech-rtate-fear

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blame@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago
[-] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 24 points 2 weeks ago

Before I was vegan I gave my cat science diet food and he got diabetes from it.

Lemmy.worlds actions make sense when you realize they are trying to develop a reddit clone to eventually monetize down the line. Their stated goal is to develop lemmy compatible software called sublinks and migrate their userbase off it specifically because they do not agree with Dessaline's and Nutomic's politics and don't think they are writing software fast enough for them.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

Being allergic to cats has saved me from so many arguments, both online and off.

[-] a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

Ma, I'm famous

Hope lemmy.wehrmacht follows their leader. Also hope you repost this comment too, fascist losers

load more comments (2 replies)

the leftism leaving people's bodies when veganism is mentioned

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
133 points (99.3% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15877 readers
501 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS