But tou don't have permission to do. And hacking a binary is much more difficult than specializing a model, for instance.
Cochise
joined 1 year ago
The model is, in the sense you can modify it. Further train it, integrate in your app, etc. But the recipe to make the model is not.
And yes, it's less open source than we can think at first sight.
The models are open source meaning you can download them and run them. But the training data and code to train the model is not. So, they stills control the model, as there is no way to replicate it.
The question is put on wrong terms. All social order is derived from violence. What make the law, the law is the menace of violence. What supports democratic institutions are the violence of police and military against who don't abide the order. So, violence is inescapable. The righ question is not if it's justified, but WHO and WHEN have the right to commit violence. When put under these terms, it's much more simpler question.
Lithuania wants to normalize relations but can't help itself and say China is not democratic, don't acknowledge its past errors and say China is a threat to Lithuania.
Sure, they are masters of diplomacy.
Uahahahaba Good analogy. I agree.
Real wages are declining, so the economy is bad. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States#/media/File:Wages_in_the_United_States.webp
He is a furry that identify as a wolf. /s
NATO is looking great with USA threatening to annex two of it's members.
Most big open source projects like Linux are entirely US and Europe dominated
Linux not so much
Reading the white paper you find the "serverless" has servers. Each community needs to be always online to serve captchas to posters. The system is federated on community level, instead of instance level, and uses DHT instead of DNS.
14
O ressentimento da classe média por trás do antipetismo, agora com provas científicas
(lemmy.eco.br)
A pesquisa de César Zucco e David Samuels e Fernando Mello aponta que o ressentimento social contra mulheres, negros e pobres, está ligado à sensação de que o seu grupo perdeu status social, e os dois podem prever o antipetismo. Agora todo mundo que tirou sarro da Marilena Chauí tem que fazer mea culpa.
Tem dois insignts muito interessantes na pesquisa:
- Ao contrário de outros países, no Brasil o contrário também é verdade. A pessoa ter baixo ressentimento e perceber que seu grupo ganhou status prevê petismo.
- Quanto ao status social, petistas, acham que todo mundo ganhou, antipetistas, acham que todo mundo, menos MST e LGBT. (Figura) Minha intuição é que antipetistas tem uma mentalidade de soma-zero enquanto petistas tem uma mentalidade ganha-ganha.
Artigo; https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/a-psicologia-afeta-concretamente-a-politica/
Pesquisa completa: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4727821
Poscast com entrevista sobre o tema: https://omny.fm/shows/an-lise-da-not-cia/lula-ou-bolsonaro-quem-influencia-elei-es-municipa
A sala de chat chama inferno?