Huh. That's weird, why would they choose to hide the "socialism" part. Scared of scaring "swing voters"? To me it seems very spineless, if that was their choice.

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 51 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

PFP and PSL have been working together in california for like a decade now. And its not like california is a swing state to scare off any swing voters.

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ahhh, didn't even know PFP was a thing of it's own. First time in hearing of it lol

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

it was formed out of anti vietnam war protests. PSL are just using PFP's resources in california for ballot access, and to not waste energy running against them

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

this is good and there should be more of it

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

its the california party they are running with

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're running under multiple parties?

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

only in california, since there is already an established socialist anti-war party there (PFP)

[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Also in South Carolina, they're endorsed and running under the South Carolina Worker's Party cause it saved some work to get on the ballot as well.

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Very cool!

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

Shes listed as independent in a lot of states