249
GUSANO CONFIRMED (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

Re-defining racism to mean structural racism and structural racism only is commandism, not tailism:

Commandism is wrong in any type of work, because in overstepping the level of political consciousness of the masses and violating the principle of voluntary mass action it reflects the disease of impetuosity. Our comrades must not assume that everything they themselves understand is understood by the masses. Whether the masses understand it and are ready to take action can be discovered only by going into their midst and making investigations.

If you "make investigations," you'll find that most people define racism as something like "prejudice or hate based on skin color." They would say, for instance, that a black American manager who gives their white employees all the shit assignments is racist in a similar way to a white manager who gives black employees shit assignments, even though the U.S. is overwhelmingly racist against black people.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 44 points 11 months ago

You're being Reddit-tier pedantic to defend a "what about whitey getting offended" Reddit-tier position.

Are you even a leftist, or do you just like le weed?

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Quoting Mao = reddit tier, got it

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

Does the word cracker personally offend you?

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

No, and you'll notice that's not at all what I'm talking about.

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

The vast majority of English speakers use "racism" to mean "prejudice or hate based on race," which covers a lot more ground than structural racism. There isn't a great reason to try and redefine racism to exclusively mean structural racism, either, because individual prejudice based on skin color is bad, too.

When people see prejudice based on skin color, the response shouldn't be "whoa whoa whoa, maybe this is OK, depending on who has power here." The response should be that prejudice based on skin color is bad in any situation, but is especially harmful where the group exercising that prejudice has structural power to hurt the target group. Some types of prejudice being worse than others does not mean there is an excusable form of prejudice. It definitely doesn't mean that the less harmful forms aren't prejudice at all.

You think its bad yet you aren't offended by it? How does that make sense? If its bad then you really should find it offensive.

[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hes saying that most people arent going to be super hip on whiteness, white skin and all the difference between terminology and if you call someone whos not already inoculated in that kind of thinking theyre going to just assume youre a weird blue haired college kid racist.

It's a losing battle and especially rings a weird way when its very white people engaging in this kind of rhetoric

Like who are you calling a cracker your parent sent you to a montessori school and you didnt pay for college

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

It's a losing battle and especially rings a weird way when its very white people engaging in this kind of rhetoric

You are right about one thing, very white people are indeed engaging in this argument. It would not be an argument otherwise.

Like who are you calling a cracker your parent sent you to a montessori school and you didnt pay for college

You should take your own advise and stop engaging in this argument. Especially after posting this. cringe

[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

It never bothers me when someone goes for the cracker/mayo stuff but I literally don't know anyone who's brain is not terminally online that says stuff like this.

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

are you from the north?

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

No removed ever called me Cracker! - redditor on why they are dodging the 2028 Sino-American war draft

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Quoting Mao = reddit tier, got it

Cherrypicking Mao so you can keep being mad at people saying cracker is Reddit tier. anti-cracker-aktion farquaad-point

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

Re-defining racism to mean structural racism and structural racism

It always meant structural racism. Just because colloquially people confused it with "some of my best friends are X" liberal colorblindness and "I'm totally not personally prejudiced/bigoted therefore it doesn't matter that I benefit from structural racism" was a matter of reactionary miseducation.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
249 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
967 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS