this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13519 readers
967 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 58 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I love this trend of "feature that is like something that already exists but is shittier and uses more resources"

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A lot of this content was already auto-generated in the sense that there are a lot of sites which operate on the business model of generic structure, data scrape, generate article about release date of popular movie or game. I imagine as a replacement of those sites this might actually be a mild improvement... well until it starts hallucinating release dates and also performs worse than human scrapers confusing new movies with ones they are remakes of or just have similar titles.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

Like I said shittier and consumes more electricity

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I wish Google would just start having a policy of immediately delisting those websites from search results, or at least deprioritizing or graying them out. If it falls under a certain category of website, it should meet certain quality standards. Like I assume they already do for medical information.

If they had a more general search version of Google Scholar where it was all stuff that Google reasonably thinks was actually made by other humans, that would improve things a lot.

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Also ad "features that exist, are now shittier, and btw, you now have to pay and oh also btw yes you will have ads even with payment. Problem? Go fuck yourself."

Great trend