this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
5 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

You cannot cleanly mine nuclear fuel. You cannot cleanly store nuclear waste.

solar panels and wind turbines famously do not require any colossal amounts of mining of hazardous materials in developing countries

all those rare earth elements that China is processing magically rose up out of the ground in their purified form instead of scarring the landscape and poisoning the water

human existence on this planet necessities environmental destruction until asteroid mining and orbital habitats become viable. you can pretend that X solution has little environmental impact while Y is extremely dangerous and bad but your opinion does not impact a 12 year old Congolese worker digging cobalt out of the earth with his bare hands in the slightest. the green revolution will be paid for in blood and contaminated soil and giant quarries, just as the fossil fuel revolution was paid for in blood and oil spills and carbon dioxide. of course, I think it's worth it, but it's generally not my blood being spilled nor my land being contaminated or quarried

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Good thing we have to continually mine more fuel for those renewables in perpetuity like we do with nuclear, right?

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

nuclear fuel reprocessing is a thing

and recycling can only take you so far, you will have to keep mining for new metals for renewables regardless