59
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For example: cigarettes

I hate them, hate their smell, hate being around people who smoke, will never smoke myself and think they are killing people

I still don’t think they should be banned

Other examples would be interpersonal lying and cheating on your partner. Both are immoral, both should not be enforced by the state.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

I think they should be banned. They are quite literally cancer sticks.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So what do we do with the people who deal in black markets for them and continue to smoke? What do we do with the illegal sellers and distributors and dealers of tobacco?

Either you give them ineffectual slaps on the wrist and we have a thriving unregulated black market, or you crack down hard and throw them in jail and we have expanded our carceral prison state with more poor addicts and made more criminals and handed a massive market over to the cartels and gangs.

[-] theturtlemoves@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

De-addiction centres? (Although personally I don't think smoking should be banned as long as the smoker does not expose others to the poison.)

[-] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

prohibiting substances does not have a great track record in terms of either effectiveness or collateral damage

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13497 readers
931 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS