this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
8 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Direct action is largely toothless

What

Iirc somebody lit themselves on fire to protest climate change and it was barely reported on.

That's a public display of total despair, not direct action against the responsible group.

[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think that in large part direct action has become less effective as corporations have learned how to deal with them. And the way they deal with them is by ignoring the problem until people forget about it.

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

State your proposed alternative to direct action.

[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I dont know is the problem. For example I'm boycotting Nestle and i have been for years at this point. They're the worst they dont think water is a human right etc. I tell everyone about it it when it comes up. But at the end of the day i dont think its doing anything to Nestle.

I support protesting however you can i guess, but I'm also very pessimistic about odds of success

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well if your only form of action is consumer activism I'm not surprised you're pessimistic. That's literally never worked ever.

[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I disagree boycotts are absolutely effective. Montgomery bus boycott. Even the starbucks boycott going on right now. If you hurt a companys source of income they tend to act pretty quickly.and it doesnt just apply to consumerism it applys to celebrities and politicians through cancelling and or not voting.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't say boycotts are worthless.

I said if your only form of action is a boycott its never going to work. Every effective boycott was accompanied by mass demonstration, public agitation, and organizing. Sometimes vandalism and even violence.

[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Fair enough I see your point