61
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13497 readers
957 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I can't tell if you're joking or not, but those companies very much do go after people who use alternative products.
And what is their success rate?
~~McDonald's~~ Monsanto can sue farmers if their produce was pollinated by their copyrighted genetic strain of ~~potatoe plant~~ corn, "Jay Walker" was made up by motor companies, and Shell has spent billions on preventing alternative transportation and hiding the evidence of climate change.
I'd say their success rate is pretty high. They might not be killing people in the streets, but they are killing people.
I'm pretty sure you're thinking of Monsanto.
Yeah, that's an oops from me. I'll edit my comment. Thanks!
Q: What happened to the GM EV-1? Or the Nissan Altra? Or the Ford Ranger EV? Or the Chrysler TEVan?
Q: What about McDonald's entire health food menu, which is basically corn syrup inside corn syrup inside some lettuce?
A: The industry didn't need to sue them into the ground. Government subsidies are set up in such a way that the products were either designed to fail (see: EV's), or a marketing exercise for liberals to feel good about their garbage choices (see: both).