61
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

These people need their knees broken man. If there’s no brutal, satisfying, divine punishment for demons in Louisiana of all places, then how can god exist

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 2 months ago

Profits will be privatised, losses will be socialised, no exceptions.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 18 points 2 months ago

I can't wait to see the utility company being sued into the ground for attempting to extract money from its customers who didn't use their service.

What's next, MacDonald's going after health food stores?

Shell going after electric vehicle owners?

[-] Storm@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

I can't tell if you're joking or not, but those companies very much do go after people who use alternative products.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 5 points 2 months ago

And what is their success rate?

[-] Storm@hexbear.net 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~McDonald's~~ Monsanto can sue farmers if their produce was pollinated by their copyrighted genetic strain of ~~potatoe plant~~ corn, "Jay Walker" was made up by motor companies, and Shell has spent billions on preventing alternative transportation and hiding the evidence of climate change.

I'd say their success rate is pretty high. They might not be killing people in the streets, but they are killing people.

[-] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

McDonald's can sue farmers if their produce was pollinated by their copyrighted genetic strain of potatoe plant

I'm pretty sure you're thinking of Monsanto.

[-] Storm@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's an oops from me. I'll edit my comment. Thanks!

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Q: What happened to the GM EV-1? Or the Nissan Altra? Or the Ford Ranger EV? Or the Chrysler TEVan?

Q: What about McDonald's entire health food menu, which is basically corn syrup inside corn syrup inside some lettuce?

A: The industry didn't need to sue them into the ground. Government subsidies are set up in such a way that the products were either designed to fail (see: EV's), or a marketing exercise for liberals to feel good about their garbage choices (see: both).

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When was the last time a large company was “sued to the ground” for wronging its customers or society? Heavily fined? Sure. Purdue went bankrupt, yet none of the family members are charged. They’ll just pop up another company or pass on the wealth to the next generation, and it’ll be another multi decade before that iteration is ‘sued to the ground.’ Like medicine, you should treat the symptoms, but you also need to prevent the symptoms from happening or else it’ll keep returning.

Not to mention, the companies are lobbying for it to be a LAW. If it gets passed and not vetoed, it means no one will be taking your lawsuit seriously.

[-] Tobberone@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

How about internet services suing companies that doesnt advertise?

/Nottheonion

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, some more monopolised segments of businesses are dreaming about this for years. And doing, like the fucking Monsanto or copyright mafias.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

Most efficient system btw

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13497 readers
965 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS