189
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Libs: "THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION THAT THERE'S GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG, AND IF YOU DARE TO BRING UP THE LACK OF EVIDENCE OF ANY SORT OF ABUSE FOR THE PAST 3 YEARS YOU'LL GET BANNED!!!!"

Also libs: "Didn't you know that 15k of the 40k humans murdered in Gaza were actually terrorists? it-is-known Also, lots of civilians die in wars like the one happening in Gaza, it's sad but inevitable"

smuglord

Fuuuuuuuuuck this shit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RomCom1989@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

Quick question,do you support Hamas?

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nope. I don't understand why people think that one side needs to be right

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

It's less about being "right" and more about which side is conducting a settler colonial genocide

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago

Israel. However hamas abducted 251 people and 97 are still unaccounted for. Two wrongs don't make a right

[-] RomCom1989@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Someone shoots you in the chest and kills your entire immediate family

You try to punch them in response

"Two wrongs don't make a right!"

Add in a pinch of us-foreign-policy and a dash of hitler-detector and voilá,you have the average liberal!

[-] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

However hamas abducted 251 people and 97 are still unaccounted for

It's notable that you think that the victims of a genocide should have no bargaining chips to negotiate with.

EDIT: Also,

Two wrongs don't make a right

You are very willing to excuse stuff like the Ukrainian military attacking civilian targets and using civilian facilities to stage military activities. For some reason, it's only non-white people whom you apply these standards to.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

No I'm not. Just haven't talked about it yet. You got the numbers because I'm having trouble finding any

[-] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

No I'm not

If taking hostages is enough for you to condemn a people to a genocide, then what the Ukrainian military does should be enough for you to support their loss, especially considering that the stakes are much lower.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Who said I supported that? There you go assuming now

[-] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Okay, if you don't support that, and you apply the same standards to the Ukrainian military, surely you support the defeat of the Ukrainian state, as well as a complete dismantlement of NATO and its states, right?

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

The only mistaken assumption anyone has made here is that you have a coherent worldview or set of politics. We really shouldn't be assuming that.

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

I have a give and take relationship with people on the internet.

This is toddler logic. You have to use violent tactics to resist genocide, it inherently involves committing "wrongs".

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

You're right. It's such easy logic that a toddler can understand it. What's your problem?

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

My problem is the real world is more complicated than a children's book. Toddler logic doesn't work in it.

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

What actions do you recommend victims of genocide take to overthrow their century-long oppressors?

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Win the debate in the marketplace of ideas pete

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Unionically that's where they seemed to be moving towards illegal-to-say

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

If I had that answer, I wouldn't be renting an apartment

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

Then why condemn Hamas, rather than refrain from speaking on the matter at all?

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I try not to unless I'm asked

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

You did, though. You took an anti-Hamas stance, condemning them for October 7th, without providing any analysis of what they should have done otherwise in your opinion.

You could have just as easily said "I am uninformed on the subject and refrain from speaking on it until I am," and that would have been better.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Please go back through the context

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago

I did. You said Israel was committing genocide, but "2 wrongs don't make a right." The conclusion is, therefore, that a hundred hostages against a genocidal oppressor is equivalent to a century of settler-colonial genocide.

This is nonsense, unless you believe Muslims to be worth less than Israelis.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Again. I support neither. I thought I made that clear

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

Saying "neither is right" draws equivalence. Saying "I don't know enough to draw conclusions" does not.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Not really. I observe actions and observe response. Hamas acted by abducting 251 people from different parts of the world due to Palestinian oppression in Gaza, and it's been like that ever since WWII where the allies supported a Jewish state in the Israel region and then pretended like giving uprooted people Gaza was enough even though zionists want and currently are taking all the land to the Med under the claim "It's our holy land. We had it first"

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

So then take a firm stance supporting Palestinian liberation and dissolution of the Zionist entity. Refuse to say "two wrongs don't make a right" and recognize that oppressed peoples have the right to use violence against their oppressors, especially when all other paths are exhausted and in the face of active genocide.

[-] m532@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

The palestinians have the answer. They're doing it right now.

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

Give us your best shot buster!

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

No. Because this has all devolved into personal attacks, insults, and "gotcha" games

[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

Your initial comment was a gotcha game you disingenuous asshole

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Case-in-point. Thanks

[-] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

Do an experiment, Einstein! Grace us with your genius! I’m sure he would’ve come up with a good reason to tut-tut the prisoners in the Warsaw Ghetto for capturing a few Nazi “civilians.”

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Man. I'm really flattered. I keep getting compared to Einstein and it's just making my day

[-] newacctidk@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

Einstein was a socialist and refused to support Zionism.

[-] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, weird. This doesn’t sound like an explanation of actions that an oppressed people could take against their oppressors.

Want to try that again?

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

You asked a gotya I asked a gotyashrug-outta-hecks

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

A give and take relationshipedgeworth-shrug

[-] m532@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

"Roll over and die"

oppa gandhi style

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

When all resistance is bad but you appeal to the idea that there's some undiscovered type of resistance that is acceptable, what you are telling the victims here to do is roll over and die until some Great Man discovers that undiscovered type of resistance that liberals don't condemn.

Fighting Israel tooth and nail is the only answer, and the handful of mostly-military captives Hamas took (and Israel fucking slaughtered!) does not mean that there is any moral equivalency ("two wrongs") or that Hamas and its coalition are not the best means Palestinians have to fight Israel.

[-] m532@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

Context: Gandhi suggested for the people being murdered by the nazis to not fight back

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

More Palestinians were dead by October 8th, and the number since then has increased by two to three orders of magnitude.

The people abducted were mostly military, and some elderly hostages were released very quickly on account of their age. Hamas takes pretty good care of the, it must be stressed, captives taken in a military conflict, while Israel has mostly been fine with slaughtering them in indiscriminate bombing in classic Hannibal Directive fashion.

This is all ignoring that, outside of children (whose parents are to be blamed), there really aren't civilians on the border with Gaza, as the "civilians" are still part of the enactment of Israel's lebensraum.

[-] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Two wrongs don't make a right

Have you considered a much more urgent and pressing matter is that ISISrael has a city-state the size of municipal Johannesburg under siege; has destroyed every mosque, university, hospital, school, UN office, several diplomatic offices, the civil registry, water treatment plant, all farmland, media office, the Court of Justice, cemeteries, most high-rise buildings, effectively banned food and water, etc. At least 50,000 (likely even in the several hundred thousands) have been massacred, with priority targets being UN workers, humanitarian aid, civil rescue/defense, paramedics, professors, doctors and journalists. Several hostages have also been killed. Deaths of Hamas fighters in contrast, have been largely incidental. All of this also recorded live on the free iPhone 15 Pro Max the Nazi soldiers are given.

Hamas was also ready to negotiate the total release of all hostages in exchange for a permanent end to hostilities literally as early as 9 October.

Take a wild guess as to why South Africa for instance, no longer has an active underground resistance.

7 October had maybe, a marginal effect on the already violent Nazi sentiments of ISISrael and it's supporters.

[-] RomCom1989@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago

Doctor RomCom diagnoses you with a classic case of us-foreign-policy

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Haha. Really reaching now aren't ya?

[-] RomCom1989@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

Not at all

Holsum slobber Ukraini Azov nazis ethnically cleansing Russians: They are only defending their country from the eeeevil! invasion of Putler, you tankie! Innocent civilians are dying!

Hamas heroically fighting the Zionazi entity:

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
189 points (97.5% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
393 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS