119

Some of you may be Communist zombies. (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 month ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

I-was-saying I do think some generations are uniquely shittier than those that come before and afterward. The kids are all right, but most of the lead-infused boomers and almost as many of the Xers, not so much.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

I don't think judging a generation by those who survived is fair. The cool people tend to die earlier

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

You might have a point, but what killed the cool Xers, then?

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

Material conditions or alternatively, were they ever that cool?

I have a theory that for many people, the youth-leftist thing isn't based in solidarity or whatever, it's based in self-interest - across generations. Makes sense to be a socialist, when you're poor, and all. As the survivors gain their riches, they get more conservative - they have property to "defend" now. They were always self-serving people, it's just they were occasionally in a position where that meant to be vaguely left.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

I-was-saying I became a leftist partially out of mutually-experienced suffering with future comrades, but primarily because I wanted others to be better off and happier. Maybe it was because of happy chemicals from helping others if some reductionist wants to be smug like that, but I still wanted to help others.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

I do not get this comment, could you be more direct?

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

I was stating that my own "youth leftist thing" wasn't necessarily self-interest unless you want to boil down the desire to help others and see them be well as neurochemically-driven "selfishness" or whatever.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

And I'd believe you, I don't think nobody helps others out of the good of their heart or whatever. Those people exist, loads of them are here.

I'm saying, when you get into generational views, it might not hold up for a large amount for them.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

As a numbers game, you're right, it doesn't.

My biological family is staggeringly loaded with chuds to the point that I moved to the opposite coast in part just to escape them.

[-] Spongebobsquarejuche@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Mine too. But they're old and need help, even though they don't see it that way. So I help them then get sick of them. Rinse repeat.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

I did that for decades of my life, but those chuds are on their own now. I'm raising a family of my own as far as I can be from their influence now. curry-space

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

Makes sense to be a socialist, when you're poor, and all. As the survivors gain their riches, they get more conservative - they have property to "defend" now. They were always self-serving people

Yeah wouldn't necessarily blame all this on people being ontologically "self-serving" from the beginning, thats liberal moralistic thinking. A shift towards cuckservativism its just an inevitable consequence of gaining wealth and property within a capitalist society. They weren't born selfish, they became selfish after years of indoctrination and falling into a position that strongly incentivises it.