Albert Szymanski, I think in "human rights in the Soviet Union", discusses a framework of oppression, in which he explains oppression as a tool that states apply when they feel like they're at risk of losing popular support. This has a lot to do with how powerful and influential a state is, the power of its media vs media of other countries, and importantly, the living conditions of people inside vs outside.
The West™ has, for the past century, had the luxury of showing itself as the paradigm of social progress and freedom, because it had the economical advantage and therefore the strongest and most omnipresent media, and people could see that they had better material conditions in many cases than in other countries (at least in terms of income, not so in welfare depending on the country). Things are changing. Since 2008, living standards in Europe have plunged, social services have been cut, and the rise of China with yearly increases in both GDP and earnings of 5%, make Europe pale in comparison. The only way the state apparatus in the west will have to make citizens believe they're still the best, is through oppression, and in China we're seeing / we will see the opposite trend.
That's my guess anyway