this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13807 readers
748 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think I might be unironically be on team #defundtheABC Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-25/fertility-rates-in-china-dropping/103654528

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait so the policy is paid for child care, pre-natal and post-natal care, IVF paid for, and cash bonuses.

The punishment for not getting pregnant is not having access to those things.

Why would you need access to baby health care and a child stipend if you don’t have children?

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

in china it seems like somebody asked "What would encourage an individual to want to carry a child be a parent?"

providing autonomy and agency for the masses through the provision of associated material needs? that's an invitation to trouble! porky-scared

in the US, to increase birth rates, we use a multipronged strategy:

  • create precarious economic conditions that push people into pairbonded couples to afford single-occupancy housing options
  • stigmatize/criminalize gender deviant behaviors
  • discourage larger communal living with zoning restrictions
  • restrict family planning tools to the wealthy
  • abysmal to non-existent sex education

porky-happy

in this way, there will be many "accidents" that must be carried to term by people with limited resources wracked with shame and guilt, pushing them into even more exploitative arrangements to sell their labor. additionally, the child services / support systems for adoption and foster have been subject to decades of austerity cuts, so the guilt of leaving a child in a "broken" system prevents many from surrendering custody. of course, healthy babies of light complexion are sought out by wealthy whites for rearing/indoctrinating.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't you still have access to those things even if you aren't pregnant?

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, you still have healthcare, but not for your non existent baby. I don’t understand what the article is complaining about.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These people are so gleeful about Chinese birthrates when their own isn’t doing so well either at the same time of curbing immigration.

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was just a news bit on the radio where they discussed how China's economy is predicted to slow down. Motherfuckers OUR economy is going into a panic/depression/recession/Whoopsy Daisy and you keep making predictions about the fall of China like you're a 40k techpriest praying to the computer before you turn it on negative ffs shut the fuck up about China you worthless fucking hacks

[–] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

The American economy has crashed like 4 times while I've been alive, and I'm not even 30 yet. Even if China's economy slowed down or had a 2008 moment, it STILL would be better then America's.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The world is on fire, everything sucks, the people in positions of political/economic power don't give a shit ... BIRTHRATES ARE DOWN EVERYWHERE.

flips over keyboard

you-hear-about-video-games