77
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by RyanGosling@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Making tens of millions of dollars probably help

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

Outrage porn. Or something similar.

Look Ethyl, look at this young man talking to this godless jezebel. We didn’t act like this growing up. What’s wrong with kids today.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

Yep, outrage porn with the added touch of "culture war" nonsense. And the people that watch it absolutely love it.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

Charlie Kirk is a hell of a guy to be criticizing someone for making money as a personality online

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

You see, women showing boobs online is bad. But Charklie Kirk showing his whole ass is okay

[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

right, what was the question?

no nevermind i dont care into the pit with you

[-] booty@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

I shit you not, "Do you have a good relationship with your father?"

In other words, yeah, straight in the cuck pit

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s always an interesting topic when reactionaries bring up “fatherless daughters.” Like dog even if this notion is correct, you’re punching down on someone you portray as a victim of bad parenting lol. But Americans, and conservatives in general, despise children unless they can use them as objects for labor or sexual gratification, so I can’t be too surprised when they ignore the sins of the father. Even ‘single mothers’ are constantly shit talked more than absentee/abusive fathers lol

[-] booty@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

The impression I get is that they think girls with shitty dads turned their dads shitty by being such a terrible daughter or whatever. I don't think that in their mind the daughter is even a victim, she's just an evil succubus corrupting society one man at a time or whatever

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

And the implication that the girl's mother was at fault for picking the wrong guy to father her children

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

"Does my face look too small for my head?"

[-] AmericaDeserved711@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

what does "e-girl" even mean anymore? I thought it was like a fashion style popular among young women immersed in internet culture, I didn't think it meant sex worker. this woman is a mainstream porn star

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Back in like early-mid 2010s, I saw it (and e-boy) used to indicate anyone on facebook with micro-celebrity status, usually with the implications of the followers being largely simps. Then around the late 2010s, I saw it referring to young people who were doing online long distance dating on platforms like discord, maybe some twitch streamers, as well as the previous definitions.

Then early 2020s I saw it transform into a fashion style indicating a weeby terminally online girl as you said (whether it was sexual or not), usually artificially or exaggerated to build a brand and online following. But it also became expanded to include girls who posted sexual/sexbait content regardless if they had any specific aesthetic.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

iLadies… nuts

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Does anyone operate well being jumped with questions?

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
77 points (98.7% liked)

chapotraphouse

13413 readers
768 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS