191
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 25 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

they would run the same campaign

I'm waging they would have simply not pulled Biden off the front of the ticket and let him take the L, so Kamala could run in 2028.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 18 points 3 hours ago

I doubt most of the party wanted to ever run Kamala

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 32 points 3 hours ago

So like, if the US election was between a prosecutor/former attorney general and a convicted felon, and the felon won... Does that mean the US electorate just officially said ACAB?

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 28 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, because the prosecutor was running under the 'ACAB party' and the felon was running under the 'Law and Order party' according to a not insignificant part of this country

[-] viva_la_juche@hexbear.net 14 points 3 hours ago

He don’t miss folks

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 7 points 2 hours ago

Winning for establishment Dems means keeping the big dollar donations flowing in. Which is the fundamental reason they suppress the left and progressive candidates, it causes the Mark Cubans to hold back on the big checks.

[-] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 15 points 4 hours ago
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13507 readers
1479 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS