129
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 22 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I’m lazy and don’t care all that much about Beezer facts but how much of his money is derived from the newspaper, versus everything ele? Because realistically unless that is a major source of it, I can’t see this doing much of anything. There’s A, plus AWS, which make him bank. Those two things need to be what people call up and cancel if they’re gonna call up and cancel anything.

What do you call this, just token liberalism or something?

Only people this is going to effect is the staffers at the ~~magazine~~ newspaper

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 7 points 5 hours ago

He actually runs WaPo at a loss. He subsidizes the newspaper to print propaganda. Libs are just mad that it is not the propaganda they want.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 11 points 7 hours ago

I think Bezos believes, with some reason, that it would hurt his name among some ghoul circles to be associated with an endorsement of Kamala over Trump (and the reverse is also true). It has basically nothing to do with the amount of money the paper makes (as OP demonstrates, this was actually bad for WP making money) and everything to do with Bezos's reputation.

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 10 points 8 hours ago

It's better than nothing. For the wrong reasons, but...meh

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13497 readers
949 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS