this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13519 readers
969 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't even agree with your shit how am I better at it than you. How are you gonna jerk off over the rules based societal order and then claim you can ignore whatever highest court you have because you personally disagree. mfer you just reinvented feudalism again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a Christian relative that is "ok with capital punishment because there are reasons" and I nearly died of irony. Would you believe they are anti-abortion too?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why yes, yes i would believe that. The classic Christian USian pro-death penalty/anti-abortion combo.

If ideology were a drive thru it would be the #2. The #1 would be fiscally conservative/socially liberal with super sized fries and a 64 oz soda

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

#1 would be fiscally conservative/socially liberal with super sized fries and a 64 oz soda

The 90s were pretty accursed billdawg planet-hillary

[–] TomBombadil@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Decade or two ago that’s how i described myself. Yes I was a cool cool highschooler

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Common USian L. So many people did that. Its always cringe to remember things we thought before deprogramming fidel-salute

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know how to tell this person this but they executed Jesus

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course they know, the whole point is that killing a radical agitator with a god complex cleanses their sins or something like that.

Sorry if I'm getting too redditor

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Christianity I think has a lot more of value to say if you work from the basis that everything King James or anyone else who has ever played golf thinks about any subject wrong

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who's King James?

I went to Sunday school, which was actually on Saturdays, but I never learn the name of the twelve apostles

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

king James was the English/Scottish king who's translation of the Bible went on to very firmly establish a lot of ideas by removing reference to tyranny being bad, translating a lot of things to mean eternal hell, his grandson would go on to establish the slave trade.

He was a paranoid murderer who's belief that the poor were more at risk of corruption by the devil led him to have roaming torurers extracting witchcraft confessions all across rural England and Scotland. He's also largely responsible for the popularisation of golf and birth of the British empire

My belief he and golfers are responsible for all bad things is largely unreasonable but on the other hand he was the king we had to learn about divine right of in school because of Shakespeare's cynical propaganda and I never stopped resenting the man for it. More reasonably the emperors Justinian and Constantine were largely responsible for Christianity becoming more of a tool of oppression. Although there is some evidence golf has roman origins so that's another mark for my "all golfers are always wrong" theory which I will admit is irrational and purely based on prejudice

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

No, I'm now fully embarked in a jihad against Golf

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That makes sense, though? Like, the Bible prescribes death for a multiple crimes.

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are correct. Here's why I find it ironic: