Is there any set of circumstances where dems would ever take meaningful, organized action against The Party?
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
181 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13517 readers
1108 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yup. Maintaining the status quo is easier than changing it. Even the tiny little bit Democrats try to change.
Why was Trump able to make so many changes? Was it because he was a better statesman than Biden?
The only people believing that Trump is actually a master of deal making is the Republicans and Blue no matter who peeps.
Reminds me of how people keep going on about the charisma of Hitler.
they don't "try to change", they expand on conservative policies while pretending that doing good things is impossible. They are controlled opposition. I'm tired of having this conversation every 4 years.
Just look at Israel. The Democratic party Hulked the fuck out, closed ranks, and absolutely shattered any and all opposition to the genocide. They are more than capable of exercising massive political power but for some reason they only ever do it for terrible things and never for "that great thing that they weawwy weawwy want if it wasn't for those mean ol' Republicans."
So fucking cool that my "harm reduction" vote has reduced so much fucking harm, I love it, a lot!!
God your spineless, how pathetic
Hey you're a fucking rube, should reflect on it. 👍
are they actually trying to change it tho
Dont you libs hate Trump so much because he did some bad things? Did he not do things? Was it just the status quo you're so mad about?
I remember when Biden first got in and Libs were saying he was a smol bean and us Chad leftists were pointing this out about Trump I saw several Libs saying "well to be honest Trump really didn't achieve THAT MUCH while in office."
Okay so you're admitting you just didn't like the guy cuz he was a uncivil dang cheeto?
Why are you dodging the questions and instead trying to turn this into a dumb semantic argument? Could it be that a liberal has nothing of value to say? Boy, that'd sure be a first!