219
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
219 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13499 readers
972 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
He didnt have to put on the dork loser clothes and glasses
Ok pol pot
Did pol pot not like glasses?
Notoriously
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/ahipzz/did_the_khmer_rouge_really_kill_everyone_with/
Can I get a tl;dr from a kind comrade out there?
TL;DR, the Khmer Rouge definitely did some of this, they kind of targeted anyone with any kind of remotely bourgeois indicators like knowing French or being literate. But most of those specific things, including wearing glasses, weren't targeted by party leadership specifically. They're just what some various individual actors decided to use to identify ppl as bourgeois.
ty :07:
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
The style of the glasses ๐ i apparently am a nudist as well
Glasses are cool, but that choice of frames ain't. Goes to show Nazi fashion-sense was purely relegated to the SS.