this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13609 readers
720 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why can't it be something fun like swapping surnames and then creating a portmaneau or blended name for the kids.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Women keeping their last names as in such notoriously feminist paradises as all of Latin America

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's still from the woman's patriline though.

If we had one name transmitted patrilineally and one name transmitted matrilineally, that'd be really cool, and would also not cascade beyond 2 surnames.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 23 points 7 months ago (3 children)

No, children should get all their parents' surnames ad infinitum. My grandkids will have 8 surnames. Their grandkids will have 32.

Say what you want, but this system has the fewest edge cases.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why's it gotta start with you, rather than retroactively accounting for as far back in your ancestry as you can go?

And how do you do the ordering of all those names?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It starts with me because I'm a special boy.

The ordering is alphabetical of course.

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago

You don’t have to go back too far before you’re gonna be mixing alphabets and using altered versions of last names.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey wait a minute, doesn't your idea also have this issue? Say currently my name is Al Funky Stuff and I have a child with Lea Johnson Smith, the kid's surnames would be Funky (my patrilineal name) and Smith (my wife's matrilineal name). But my wife's matrilineal name is not actually matrilineal, it's her mom's patrilineal name. So we'd have to go and switch it out for her mom's second surname, which itself is her grandma's patrilineal surname, and so on. So you'd end up having to trace your genealogy regardless of how many surnames a child inherits. Unless I misunderstood your system?

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

The matriline names would need to be inaugurated.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago

Jugemu Jugemu Gokou no Surikire Kaijari Suigyou no Suigyou Matsu Unrai Matsu Fuurai Matsu Kuuneru Tokoro ni Sumu Tokoro Yabura Kouji no Bura Kouji Paipo Paipo Paipo no Shuuringan Shuuringan no Guurindai Guurindai no Ponpokopii no Ponpokonaa no Choukyuumei no Chousuke but every part except "Chousuke" was actually the surname

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago

No, children should get all their parents' surnames ad infinitum. My grandkids will have 8 surnames. Their grandkids will have 32.

Say what you want, but this system has the fewest edge cases.

Having names like the ones breeders give to purebred dogs would be hilarious.