this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
118 points (99.2% liked)

news

23943 readers
868 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump says he will impose additional tariffs on China, from Tuesday, if Beijing does not withdraw its 34% retaliatory tariffs on the US.

The additional tariffs on Beijing would be of 50%, Trump says.

As a reminder, China announced on Friday that it would be imposing such tariffs on Washington after the White House said that from 9 April it'd put 34% levies on all goods from Beijing.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 109 points 1 week ago (3 children)

absolutely incredible. I hope nobody blinks and we get up to like 1000% tarrifs, to the point that trafficking in black market Chinese stuff becomes a whole ass enterprise and Americans make knock off Chinese stuff because it becomes a status symbol for wealth.

let's completely lose our collective shit on this one.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Nascar 2: boats (possibly planes)

EDIT: or drones?

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

think-about-it

They do have those new nuclear batteries in the pipeline.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

EDIT: or drones?

We love our Big, Beautiful Droners - don't we folks.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

temu's slogan "shop like a billionaire" coming true when all the products cost $900,000 after import taxes

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 68 points 1 week ago

At this point just agree that you would rather completely destroy American dollar hegemony than make one single compromise and be done with it. Sanction China completely and fully and end the last vestiges of the unipolar world. I double dog dare you

[–] Xenomorph@hexbear.net 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

jdpon don to all maoist third-worldists: patriots in control!

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

God that would rule so hard if it were real.

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 61 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

INFINITE TARIFFS ON THE WESTERN WORLD mao-aggro-shining

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

but I said "No Backsies"! You can't retaliate to my tariffs with your own tariffs!

speech-l

trump-anguish

xi-button amerikkka

[–] jack@hexbear.net 50 points 1 week ago

truly, the sun in the sky is red

long live the great unity of the peoples of the world

we will wage a 10,000 year struggle against American imperialism

[–] SockOlm@hexbear.net 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

American Millennium of humiliation

[–] buh@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

whoever is around in 1000 years will be talking shit about us the way we talk shit about medieval peasants in europe

[–] Finger@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago

no more half measures walter

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago

I hope Bejing instates a perpetual No You Plus One policy.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago

apple must be having a lot of fun rn

[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

Sure we could speedrun the end of US financial hegemony but what about my treats?

[–] Bloobish@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago

Oh please God yes, please let this happen, let the US keep hitting itself in the face and increase tarrifs on a key importer that'll further collapse whatever industrial base we have

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago
[–] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

angry-place "it's not about the economy, it's about sending a white nationalist message"

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Time to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes

[–] Future_Honkey@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Actually, I’ve been thinking it ever since I got here. Why, oh why didn’t I take the blue pill?"

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Uphold Ralphist-Cypherettoist Thought

[–] buh@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

looks like the markets need some laxative

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

lmao, my man clenched at both ends.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In "my specific thing" news, it turns out that China is the world's biggest producer of cheap, high quality corundum gems, including the kind commonly used for lasers

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

Hell yeah, unlimited laser genocide on the first world

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

In "specific thing" side news, it turns out the only way to produce modern high-performance semiconductors is through extremely high-powered megawatt lasers.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

My company specializes in laser based air analysis machines, and our largest clients are all in China. This is going to be a rough year…

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump can dish it out but can't take it, huh?

[–] Comrade_Mushroom@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

Do it fucker

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

At this rate, I'm expecting that after tariffs fail to intimidate China that he'll start posting hog.

[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago
[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Time to show him the original zappruder film boys

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

This is a jam even ole' Donny Boy can't wriggle out of.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They said "hard decoupling with China, no way, never happen, Americans buy too much stuff, are too big on treats, would never be allowed". And yet... here we are.

Once it's done Chinese factories will close. It won't happen in a week or a month, but within 3-6 months they're going to close factories because the demand just vanishes, unless the government of China starts handing out checks to keep the lights on this will have impacts on China. They can't just route all this stuff to the EU or Africa or whatever, the US is a huge, huge market with specific specifications for power supply and connectors and safety stuff and so on so things would need to be retooled but even after that that's a bunch of demand that's just gone for a while and Trump and co seem to be betting the US can hold out longer than China.

More interestingly for me someone stuck in the US it'll have impacts in the US. In that while companies don't want to move their production from China because it costs money, if they are already bleeding money from lost/no-sales they have little choice. They'll move it to Vietnam, to India, to Mexico, wherever at great expense and the prices will never return to the pre-tariff levels but they'll have production and some people will be able to afford some amount of it. The economy will implode but that doesn't particularly matter because it's just another chance for the capitalists to profit and buy up all the pieces at rock bottom prices while absolutely fucking cost of living, destroying the hopes most people to have any kind of quality of life, etc but that's fine they think the proles have it too good anyways and need disciplining.

I always thought that they'd use Taiwan like Ukraine as a pretext to force decoupling but now maybe they figure they can just make Trump do this, assign all the blame to him while he and a subset of the tech companies hold down wall street and force it to do this "for its own good". It's an interesting kind of disciplining of international finance capital by another segment of the bourgeoisie and by empire planners. If it all goes well they achieve their wants, if it all blows up then they blame it on Trump.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 week ago

There was a post here recently about Chinese economics. The value of Chinese exports as a percentage of Chinese GDP is quite low compared to the majority of countries in the world. There will be an adjustment for sure, but it's not going to send the Chinese into catastrophe

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry but you're way off base. China's exports to the US only account for ~3% of their GDP.

USA could halt all Chinese imports overnight and China would barely notice.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I feel that number has to be telling less than the full story using some clever calculation. I get they have a policy of domestic consumption but you can only do so much of that. More than that I think the GDP number you cite doesn't really reveal how many jobs would be lost which is an actual problem. You can't just take a hit of your sales halving to a big market like the US and keep all the factories open, some are just going to close entirely and others will eliminate shifts. Because that's what we'll see if 50% tariff rates stick or even worse get up to 80% or higher from Trump retaliating on China's retaliation.

China can probably take if far better than the US but I have to wonder if the US even cares. If at this point we're not at a take the toys and build a high fence around the yard and go home and this is less about hurting China as opposed to autarky at home and setting that up and attempting to transition from capitalism to some sort of barbarism with the belief that robotics and AI will make enough proles redundant that the bourgeoisie or a group of them can just rule as aristocracy over the result. It won't work in the long-run but they'll kill an awful large amount of us before they ever realize that. And that worries me more than China surviving the US attempting to beat on it economically using this.

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get they have a policy of domestic consumption but you can only do so much of that.

You're missing one very crucial part of this equation: BRICS. China has been spending the last 20 years cultivating these relationships.

BRICS is currently a more powerful, more influential, and more wealthy trading bloc than the G7. IIRC BRICS is about 35% of global GDP, and G7 is 25%.

If the US stops buying Chinese products they can simply sell them somewhere else.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

They can definitely sell them elsewhere, and if companies threaten to abandon ship, while I am just hypothesizing here, China likely has a legal way to seize the factories to prevent the loss of productive capacity.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

It will definitely have an effect on China, but they’ve been working on decoupling for years already. That’s exactly what BRICS and Belt and Road are facilitating. BYD is the largest EV brand in the world despite not selling in the US, Huawei still one of the biggest phone brands despite being banned. It’ll slow things down there, but it’s hardly an existential crisis.

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 week ago

This might shock you, but there are in fact more places in the world than just the US and China.