this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
175 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
775 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 68 points 9 months ago

By and large, Alexander was bi and large

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 53 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Another good example was DaVinci, the ass he gave god in the Sistine chapel in itself is a damn good argument for him being gay and a troll along with his journals (though a theology major once argued with me it'd be blasphemy to give an artistic rendition of god anything but the best ass possible).

[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 58 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Sistine chapel was Michelangelo. The one with the nunchucks.

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago

Oops, I'll leave it since that's funnier

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

(though a theology major once argued with me it'd be blasphemy to give an artistic rendition of god anything but the best ass possible).

That makes sense tbh. Also makes sense to get a gay guy to paint God for that exact reason.

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yea that's what we ended up agreeing on, that and a lot of the Renaissance artists probably saw love and divinity as the same thing. To have a poor art history major in that room lol.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

(though a theology major once argued with me it'd be blasphemy to give an artistic rendition of god anything but the best ass possible).

I'm sorry, this is the religion whose followers are commonly seen being homophobic? thonk

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ikr, his argument was 'oh it wasn't as severe in those days' (total horseshit) also something about pre-modern man seeing the world-universe as perfect, not just sacred, and by extension the human form. Idk about that neither, in those days pretty much just existing and being born was a sin, there's a gap between whatever he was arguing and real world shaping things imo. Whatever, too much religious exhilaration in an academic setting poisoned him.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He's like...sorta kinda right about the human form stuf, man being made in the image of God means that God would be the hottest man is the quick version, but a theology major is pretty likely to have a pretty eack view of history, cause that does play into things but is far from an exclusive factor. It's not like...totally wrong but is so reductive that it's worse than just being wrong cause it requires a long multidisciplinary explanation that I'm too about to make supper for to deal with

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MorelaakIsBack@hexbear.net 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

hordes of eunuchs practiced in playing the women's part

hordes, you say sicko-intrigued

[–] SkibidiToiletFanAcct@hexbear.net 51 points 9 months ago

mmmm, love me sexual violence when it's femboy coded.

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

History is gay AF. That's why they only teach the marketed versions in school. Even the bible... Pretty sure Lucifer and God just had a sloppy breakup.

If I can't have you no one can! Leviticus write this down!!

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Cast out because he saw God wasn't doing what God itself was preaching.

I've come to learn angels are actually just demons.

They are both just one in the same,

Talking bullshit for their own personal gains.

And "...if angles had fingers connected to strings,

Then we would be puppets, and love would be king.

War wouldn't be a word with any worth,

They made earth on hell instead of heaven on earth."

(Quote part is from Ancient Astronauts - Oblivion - The Poet Azeem is the lyricist.)

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago

Pretty sure angels and demons were originally other mesopotanian gods and demigods before it went monotheistic.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Satan isn't real, biblically

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

??? There's certainly a Satan-like figure (Ha-Satan) in the Bible, specifically in the Books of Job and Zechariah. Many Jews interpret that figure as a metaphor, like the "idea" of evil, not a fallen angel type dude, but Satan is definitely real and in the Bible.

[–] Vncredleader@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, though even then the idea of a singular figure in opposition to God is not present at all in the Talmud. And the earlier Hebrew books of the Bible have no supernatural satans, which is translated as "adversary"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sYhbtk8jJc

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 37 points 9 months ago (14 children)

Were the Greek the type to think anal sex with another man was okay as long as you weren't the bottom?

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No it was the Vikings who did that weird shit

Greek dudes were just gay

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Egh, the Romans did it...

Edit: the Romans made the notion that it's not gay if you're Dom, just to clarify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

turks beeing greeks confirmed ..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Skeleton_Erisma@hexbear.net 36 points 9 months ago

Me sicko-charging

Alexander boykisser

Whatever frothingfash

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Eunuch essentially means trans woman or enby fyi, unless forcefully made one by someone else. The cult of Cybele was very prevalent in Greece and they referred to themselves with female pronouns, many similar cases in the Levant and Persia. So let's not assume that it's gay, but it definitely was a queer situation

Very few people (some asexuals for example) would willingly become a eunuch outside of being trans or as a punishment.

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I know from the courses I took that in the Byzantine world, becoming a eunuch could be an avenue to familial advancement, if you could get employment in the imperial palace bureaucracy in Constantinople. Some eunuchs even became powerful enough that they made their brothers emperor, like with Michael IV. It's all very interesting history to learn about.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

yes, i actually know a trans lady that is wanting to write a book about trans history through a marxist lens, and a lot of societies were like this before industrialization and the spread of mercantilism. ive been helping her get into contact with people so she can touch on every region of the world, im mostly parroting what she has told to me. eunuchs (re: usually trans people) held an immense amount of power due to 'checking out' of inheritance, which was necessary for primitive accumulation and allowed bureaucracies and impartial judges to appear. to the point that eunuchs were THE people to please, and were given all sorts of things for free, like primitive hrt, food, money, surgeries, leniency for homosexuality in some homophobic societies, ability to create laws and solve marital and inheritance disputes, and so on

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's cool to hear that your friend is writing about the topic. It's interesting to explore that aspect of societies through a materialist lens like that. Just off the top of my head I'm thinking right now of how these societies essentially tried to use eunuchs to get around bureaucrats reducing the effect of meritocratic recruitment through generational acquisition of privileges through their offspring. But eunuchs like John the Orphanotrophos still found a way around it.

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Didn't Alexander share a tent with his best friend Hephaestion though? With descriptions of them reading letters together, kissing a ring to the others lips to keep a secret, and Alexander "yielding to Hephaestion's thighs". And after Hephaestion died, Alexander showed immense grief.

That sounds very gay to me. Or bisexual and polygamous considering they also had wives. To be honest applying modern conceptions of sexuality to ancient Greek rulers probably doesn't work too well.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

of course, im not saying alexander wasnt gay or bi, but that eunuchs were often trans

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Oh cool, thanks for the interesting information, I didn't know that. Though it makes sense when you explain it.

It's interesting how you never really learn about these things in history class. I remember surprising my history teacher with some interesting questions. It should be taught, LGBT history. Trans history especially, given all the nonsense right wing propaganda out there about how "being transgender is a modern phenomenon".

[–] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Didn't Alexander share a tent with his best friend Hephaestion though?

Yes and Hephaestion had died less than a year before Alexander. His body had to be physical pried away from Alexander because he wouldn't leave it for the entire day. He wept and didn't eat for three days after and had the doctor looking after Hephaestion hanged. He declared an empire wide period of mourning. They also both married daughters of Darius and Alexander hoped that a child who was related to the both of them would one day rule. You know ... normal heterosexual things.

Hephaestion's wikipedia page is where they put all the gay stuff since I guess it's too offensive to have in Alexander's.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago

With descriptions of them reading letters together

Fellas, is it gay to read correspondence with another bro?

Jokes aside, I think we should be careful applying the sexual and cultural standards of modern western culture across borders and time. For example, it's still very common in the middle east for men who are friends to hold hands while walking down the street. To us that's a sign of homosexuality, to them it's just bros being bros.

That all being said, taking a stance that any ancient Greek figure was straight as we know it is hilarious.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thought it was a male who was castrated before puberty?

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

so thats a later thing in the catholic church, but you can also find people that referred to themselves as women or a 'third gender' in that context. some however were also forced because the catholic church is problematic. in this catholic idea, eunuchs are sexless and do not have sex, but this was obviously not the case in so many instances.

eunuchs also had various roles in different cultures. there was a jewish king for example that had a eunuch in his harem was implied to be treated as a woman as a result (re: fucked like a woman). theres also some theories that Puyi was in love with his 'eunuch', and they lived together after the revolution in China (was told this by chinese friends) and might have been a big part of why he was spared (no progeny)

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The big thing with being a eunuch is that the idea was that because you gave up having direct descendents, it meant that you could more easily be trusted to run bureaucratic tasks for the good of the royal line. Whether or not this works is one of those oft-debated ancient and medieval political science topics of the time (particularly in China) with most petty lords that would lead revolts against kings/emperors blaming the bad government on the influence of eunuchs. If this was true or not is unknown, but the ones that won were the victors so their histories survive.

As far as I am aware though, you are correct that the only culture that believed eunuchs to be 'sexless' is the Catholic Church.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Interesting, I didn't know the term had such a wide definition. I remembered it in the context of the Ottoman sultans, who used eunuchs to guard their harems.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The wider definition is becoming more common with recent scholarship, a lot of historians ommitted source materials on eunuchs demanding to be referred as women or otherwise, and some of this source material is even first person due to many eunuchs being clergy and literate

There's a lot of work being done on the restudy of history without chauvinism these days

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago

Eunuch essentially means trans woman or enby fyi, unless forcefully made one by someone else.

that vast majority of eunuchs were forcibly made eunuchs, and this is true across different cultures. Eunuchs would usually be servants or slaves who had been castrated to make them less threatening servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence.

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Did people really not know Alexander the Great was bisexual or gay in some way? I remember it because I watched some terrible movie about him nearly 20 years ago as a kid. The one with Collin Farrell and Angelina Jolie in it.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They made two Alexander the Great movies with Collin Farrell and Anjelina Jolie??

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

According to Wikipedia there are four versions of the film lmao

Four versions of the film exist, the initial theatrical cut and three home video director's cuts: the "Director's Cut" in 2005, the "Final Cut" in 2007, and the "Ultimate Cut" in 2014.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'll wait for the Final Ultimate Director's Cut before I check it out

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago

They all suck so don't worry lol. 16% on rotten tomatoes.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago

Release the Snyder Cut

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] squirrel@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago

🐿️🏳️‍🌈

[–] davel@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

shaun gtfo bsky wtf r u doin

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] duderium@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago

Haven’t read it in twenty years but The Persian Boy is about this and was pretty good.

I knew he was bi but, did not really hear about this relationship he had. It's interesting to hear about it.

load more comments
view more: next ›