256
anglo moment (hexbear.net)
submitted 4 months ago by moonlake@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 111 points 4 months ago

Best part of this is that Russians have three names (a first name, surname, and a patronymic) and they love using nicknames. So the main character is Rodion (first name) Romanovitch (patronymic) Raskolnikov (surname), but can (and is) called by any of those three names. He's also got nicknames like Rodya, Rodenka, and Rodka. So this deranged individual (who decided to call Raskolnikov "Pete" I guess) is going to be hopelessly confused when somebody starts referring to Rodya, and he'll think the book is filled with like five times as many characters as it actually is.

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 35 points 4 months ago

I’m reading What is to be Done? And idk what book this is, but I imagine it would be pretty hard to replace names like that.

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 41 points 4 months ago

This is Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky.

[-] CTHlurker@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

Just replace every instance of "Kautsky" with "Steve" like the goober in the OP

[-] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Better idea: replace regular fiction names with political figures

~~Greg Heffley~~ Friedrich Engels

[-] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 34 points 4 months ago

YES. When I studied Rus Lit my prof dedicated a whole lecture to this! With slides! I honestly love this part of Russian literature, it gives it so much character, and anyone who complains about it doesn’t deserve to read it.

[-] DyingOfDeBordom@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

I mean you kinda just laid out why it's extra confusing to begin with

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 30 points 4 months ago

But that's kind of the rub; it's never actually confusing. In context of the story it's very clear when somebody is addressing Raskolnikov, even if they're using a nickname or a name you're not entirely familiar with. It's like when you hear somebody has a nickname in real life. You might not know why they have that nickname, but you know that nickname is theirs.

[-] DyingOfDeBordom@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I read the book, unless you're already familiar with Russian naming conventions you're going to go "wait who the fuck are they talking about" over and over, and if you're not familiar with Russian naming conventions and claim otherwise you're simply lying to me

also it's not just Raskolnikov

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

I don't know what to tell you, I too read the book and had no such issues. I thought it was very clear when they're talking about Raskolnikov or his sister or the inspector or the landlady or anybody, and I don't speak any Russian. You just had to trust things would become clear in time with context.

[-] ToxicDivinity@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago

Everyone's brain works different

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah I think that's what it comes down to.

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago

You have a point in that the characters are very vivid and distinct/individual

but I think it's fair to say most people will experience at least mild confusion a few times with the cast of characters

[-] DerEwigeAtheist@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It is not that difficult, because there are contexts to each use, and they are consistent between characters as well. It is not always easy as well, but if you have the attention span to read Dosteyevski, you have it to remember some naming conventions as well.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 48 points 4 months ago

If your cracker ass can remember hundreds of pokemon names for the duration of a game, you can remember a dozen russian names for the duration of a book

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 41 points 4 months ago

he could probably remember the names if there was a picture next to them most of the time.

i love casual ableism as much as the next guy but i have to flip to the dramatis personae sometimes even when the character names are anglo

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm shit at names too, this is just a silly way of handling it

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

It is supremely poorly thought out that's for sure lol

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 28 points 4 months ago

Cursed monkey paw: "Damn, I can believe that Squirtle's brother got arrested by Tsar Lapris's secret police for spreading the seditious works of Koffing."

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago

a dozen

There's probably over 100 characters in it tho, maybe 200

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 37 points 4 months ago

huh. I mean, I have made charts to try to keep track of families and shit in byzantine politics novels, but, uh... huh.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago

when this is done by the author to obfuscate a fictional portrayal of real people, it's called a roman a clef https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_%C3%A0_clef

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For anyone that doesn't want to click but likes words, it's French for 'novel with a key', as in if you know the key you can understand the underlying allegory.

[-] EcoMaowist@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago

typical anglo L

[-] frosty99c@midwest.social 27 points 4 months ago

I'd love to see what he does with 100 years of solitude. There are only like 4 names for 15 different characters

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 26 points 4 months ago

If you don't give the characters racist caricature like names how can I keep them straight?

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

Cannot imagine your first reaction to name-memory difficulty being "imma give em white guy names"

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago

I keep a digital copy on the side and Ctrl+F the character's name so I can get a refresher on them when I'm reading Dostoevsky.

Part of the problem is the 3 names as the other commenter said, and part of it is that the style of book has 100s of characters, much like a soap opera.

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Crime and Punishment is my second favorite book. That said, I was confused when Raskolnikov's friend's name was randomly switched up. That's when I learned that Russians and Latinos share the having four or five names thing in common. Absolutely based tradition, though I'm surprised I remember my own name sometimes.

It's also not best advised to read that book when you're a college-aged boy short on cash. Or maybe it is...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago

Doing rowling naming conventions:

Axe Mcprison-ov

Mona E. Lander-ov

Norm Horseaccident-ov

Fbi Copper-ov

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago

Liberals when the black guy isn't named "Kingsley Shacklebolt"

Also, I didn't make that shit up.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

Cho Chang and Privy Patel Asian representation yay

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 4 months ago

~~Roger Raskolnikov~~ just Roger lmao.

It's like a fucking mirror universe, i stopped reading the first book of their favorite series in half because i couldn't stand how absolutely idiotic the name convention was there.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

Jowling Kowling Rowling has the laziest names

[-] AutoVomBizMarkee@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

Recently read A Fire Upon the Deep were half the story takes place on a planet with dog like group mind beings whose names are the combination of every member and if members die and they get a new member the name changes to include the new member, but they also use nicknames for the group beings whenever they feel like it. This person would have a great time with that book. Also book was eh but fun.

[-] Krem@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago

also there were intelligent flowers that zoomed around in little gokarts and waved their leaves to talk

maybe the first book to envision racist shitposting leading to genocide

[-] AutoVomBizMarkee@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Oh yea they were fun to picture in my head. And yea the intergalactic genocidal shit posts were really something to enjoy reading in 2024.

[-] Sons_of_Ferrix@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Also racist butterfly people.

Also I just learned the author just died a month ago. Think he was some kind of AnCap, but was pretty good at writing weird SciFi tho.

[-] Des@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

maybe like highlight the names with different colors or something until you get used to them

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nah, this is a fine thing to do and I support it heartily!

Especially recommend stuff like this when reading theory, Lenin likes to call dudes out by name and hyper specific organizations and membership etc, when those details don't really matter much for my purposes reading this 120 years later

Ive never actually gone in and replaced names, but I kind of glance at them and go "this is guy 1" and move on

Or more specifically like "opportunist leader of anti-bolshevik faction guy" etc etc. It's really not worth remembering every single name

Also, some people find remembering names hard, let alone unfamiliar ones

This is however still a funny post lol

[-] DerEwigeAtheist@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A novel is not a piece of political theory. The aims are different, also russian naming conventions are more complex than english ones.

Also I believe on should try and actually engage with the cultural context of a piece of art(the novel) and not just to actively remove it. Why read russian literature then?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] CTHlurker@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

In the Lenin texts I just sort of gloss over those names. Like you said, those people are long dead and their orgs have been dead and buried since before the russian civil war.

[-] DerEwigeAtheist@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

It's nice for historical purposes though, exact sourcing is just very good praxis, when writing any theory.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Hello, I'm john smith jr

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The content isn't difficult, however I did have difficulties with some of the content.

Isn't this pretty normal to do when translating though? I feel like a lot of books change names when they're too difficult to parse in the other language. For a super fast example of what I mean: Donald Duck isn't named Donald in other countries. His three nephews names are different as well.
Obviously if the translator didn't do it, then that's probably for a very good reason and doing bulk replaces are bound to mess things up, but the act itself seems relatively normal to me?

[-] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

Brb, doing this with The Silmarillion

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
256 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22643 readers
369 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS