There's 20 other portraits that are also abstract and now the only one anyone will care about is hers, and she's ensured millions of people who otherwise wouldn't know about it have seen it
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13528 readers
789 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
streisand effect
Im of two minds. Leave it up because it causes some rich asshole even the slightest bit of discomfort.
But also, take it down because its a painting of a rich POS who doesnt deserve to have a canvas used in her image, however distorted it may be.
But i dont know shit about anything so
Making rich people upset is almost always good and funny imo
Take it down unless she doesn't want it up, in which case, leave it up to annoy her. So definitely leave it up
Yeah, thats it. Whichever option pisses her off the most is the right one.
The artist was Aunt Tifa 
Cry harder, fragile little nepo-baby who would decry cancel culture and defend the use of racial caricatures for mascots as "honouring" the people they are supposed to represent.
You're just being honoured, sweetie. Let people honour you okay?
Also she's a perfect case of the "garbage-out" side of the garbage-in, garbage-out equitation. [CW: for some really egregious racism] This is the person who raised her speaking candidly in a time that exists within living memory for a lot of people. This entire family needs to be abolished, along with Australia, asap.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Lol, it's really quite a flattering take.
Funny, also the portrait of Chuck on the top row looking like a fucking Muppet has me rolling.
Real life Charles has pink felt-like skin due to all the aristo inbreeding
Hot