168

Meanwhile, in America, a drug manufacturer sold tainted eye-drops that killed and seriously maimed people, and not one exec has faced consequences. There's barely been any media scrutiny, just boilerplate articles that refuse to name names or even attempt to explain what the fuck went wrong. As for the FDA, I've given up on them. They're fucking useless.

I'm against the death penalty, but at the same time I can't stand lib orgs like Amnesty who screech about how DYsTOPiAn the death penalty is in China when we have the exact same system here in the States except worse because it targets poor and non-white people exclusively.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You should repost this but instead of eyedrops compare it to the recent incident in 2021 when Abbott, the largest manufacturer of baby formula in the US, sold tainted formula that caused hundreds of infants to become ill and resulted in at least 9 confirmed infant deaths.

The US media didn't say shit about the deaths and failed to mention that the FDA only discovered the issue from the findings of a CDC investigation of a string of infant deaths across the US. At least 9 infants died but none of the company leadership faced any criminal charges. Instead the CEO of Abbott received a 20 million dollar bonus that year.

"We now know that contrary to initial reports, nine babies who were fed Abbott powdered infant formula manufactured in their Sturgis, Michigan facility have died," said Congresswoman DeLauro. This is heartbreaking and shameful. Many of these deaths could have likely been prevented if Abbott Nutrition and the FDA did not drag their feet to investigate credible allegations of substandard food safety practices at the plant. And what is deeply disturbing is the timeline in which these events unfolded.

"In February 2021, an entire year before the voluntary recall, Abbott and the FDA were alerted to allegations concerning problems at the Sturgis, Michigan manufacturing facility through a complaint filed by an employee. The problems included failing equipment in need of repair and formula released without adequate evidence that it was safe for consumption. Abbott confirmed receipt and submitted a formal response to the complaint two months later.

"Despite knowing this information, it was not until September 2021 that the FDA conducted a routine inspection of the facility and learned of the potential link between a specific rare and deadly foodborne pathogen and powdered infant formula manufactured by Abbott. At the same time, an infant in Minnesota given formula manufactured in Abbott's Sturgis, Michigan facility was diagnosed with Cronobacter sakazakii. This was the first case reported

http://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-statement-additional-infant-deaths-and-hospitalizations-1

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago

tobacco companies in China remove nitrosamines from their tobacco, while amerikan companies dont. this makes Chinese cigarettes considerably less carcinogenic than amerikan cigs

[-] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago
[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

Peak. Performance.

[-] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

This is what i aspire to be on my morning jogs.

[-] jungekatz@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Thats coz uhmrica is the so called free market !

[-] wahwahwah@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

B U T A T W H A T C O S T ?

[-] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

not that I don't believe you, but do you have a source on this? I wanna save it for libs

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this study shows the average nitrosamine concentration in Chinese cigarettes is 70 ng/cigarette, with the lowest at 10. this study shows that only 2 of the tested amerikan cigarettes contain less nitrosamines than the Chinese average, at 55 and 66 ng/cigarette. and there are 10 that exceed 300, with a high of 460! the most dangerous Chinese cigarette was at 261

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

Nooooo, you can't just execute the people responsible for multiple infant deaths as if they were poor people

They should get house arrest, maybe a couple months of white collar prison. Then they can't lobby for laws to be changed to make their actions technically legal.

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

Woah Woah, prison time? That’s way too draconian, a fine equal to 2% of their monthly profits should suffice.

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

A fine?! What is this? Soviet North Korean Gestapo? These people are job creators and those money you want to confiscate is their private property. No, the responsible and adult thing to do is to look forward and allow them to grow and learn from their mistakes, without wasting our time in petty grudges.

[-] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

The crimes of capital deserve capital punishment.

[-] red_stapler@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

ypg-brace Look, I’ve got some opinions about the death penalty…. But if you are involved in some libertarian shit that results in the deaths of 6 children, we’re gonna have to take you out. brace-cowboy

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Thing is with crimes of capital it's very easy to measure who did the fucked up shit. And if you made a mistake, odds are you merced a guy down with starving kids in Africa or something

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So in conclusion, death penalty for capitalists and fascists, no one else.

I think thats something we all can agree on

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Finger@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago
[-] GorbinOutOverHere@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

no more half measures, walter

[-] wahwahwah@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty soon it'll be illegal to sue corporations. I give it five years, maybe less given how reactionary the Supreme Court is.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

Pretty soon corporations will be suing random commenters on the internet for defamation whenever they say anything negative about them

[-] wahwahwah@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

Except they already do that now. Companies have abused the legal system to go after negative Yelp and Glassdoor reviews.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

Abused? Working as intended

[-] Teekeeus@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago
[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Think of how much more efficient this is! Instead of all the time and money wasted ~~bribing~~ lobbying politicians, corporations can just vote in Holden Bloodfeast directly now!

[-] JuneFall@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

How much is it to found a company in Delaware and how many do I have to found to get 50%+1 of the vote?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

Again the CCP shows its authoritarian streak by using violence against an oppressed minority (libertarian capitalists).

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kristina@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

sometimes wonder if my eye sensitivity is from my parents using eye drops on me as a kid tbh 🤔

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago
[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I want off of Mr Fun Facts ride

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

BUT WHO WILL INNOVATE liberty-weeping

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Unless you have a serious or diagnosed eye condition that benefits greatly from eyedrops - why have them? They seem like a thoroughly unnecessary product to me.

[-] JuneFall@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Contact lenses often benefit from eye drops, however plenty of people, especially workers who look at screens for long times develop conditions that can be somewhat managed by eye drops (or by changing the work place).

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Itchy eyes get not itchy

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

I do rarely get really dry or itchy eyes, normally if there's a lot of dust or pollen in the air.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
168 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
484 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS