Look, I understand that people are upset, but she's crossing her arms in the picture. We haven't had a chance to oggle her cans. She could have F cups under there.
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
233 readers
499 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
now we're really getting into the big questions, folks. RELEASE THE TWINS
Why is it always the leaders remembered as heroes who are in games? They should add some of the bad leaders as well, Nicholas II, the most inbred of the Habsburgs, Gorbachev, Liz Truss, all the kings with names like "Hunger" and "the Mad".
they all have to be pretty ancient. Can't really have Hitler or Trump or Obama without enraging a bunch of the playerbase
they used to have Mao in civ 4 :(
If they put Obama in the next Zelda game I'm gunna' be pissed.
ganondorf getting btfo by link's new mq4 reaper drone ability
uhhhh let me be kokiri... if you like your deku nut, you can keep it
I like Tuabman and I like diversity in my games but I hate the implication that the USA is sufficiently not fascist and white supremacist to have her as a leader.
in the civilization universe, all civilizations are a blank slate that start during the early agrarian era. They don't yet pick an ideology or colonize others or do anything at that point. Also, in civ 7 she can be the leader of any civilization, leaders aren't bound to specific civs
That's how I justify it to myself at least, it falls apart upon any introspection but that's how it goes with a silly 4x game with hammers and beakers
"fascism is just more industrial resource and nothing else!!!" i do not like modern civ games
I agree it should have some type of penalties, but it’s hard to implement fascism if you aren’t willing to include dirty historical realities like genocide and ethnic cleansing and colonialism.
I understand why Civ doesn’t want to allow naziboos to roleplay as a genocidal maniac in their game
then don't implement fascism as a playable option 
Then we will lose communism as a playable option. The moment Firaxis removes fascism the “both sides” whining will be overwhelming
Yeah for sure I don’t actually object to this.
I am immensely unentertained by the Civ franchise and its model of taking a selection of cities and people and tossing them haphazardly on a random-seeded map.
Game Category
- Shit's Boring, Who Cares
harriet tubman never held public office!!!!
the humble gandhi since civ 1: 
plus civ 7 is purposefully adding a bunch of leaders that weren't officially national leaders, people like Da Vinci or Benjamin Franklin. It makes added sense since you play as 3 different civilizations throughout the game and your civilization changes but your leader stays the same.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The US doesn't deserve to have someone as heroic as Harriet Tubman to represent it.
luckily, Civ 7 is kinda doing the Humankind thing and separating the leaders from the civs to some extent
meaning, Harriet Tubman doesn't have to lead the yankoid shitheap afaik
I know we're getting into more Paradox than Civ here, but I'd like to see it as, if John Brown or Nat Turner succeed, then she's the leader of the new America.
John Brown as a Great General when?
100% true
Literally everything Gamergate dipshits said about "SJWs" was projection:
- They're ridiculously sensitive and easy to offend.
- They want to force the entire industry to conform to their politics.
- They're single-minded obsessives who go nuclear the moment a game fails a single one of their myriad purity tests.
- A large portion of them are tourist outsiders invading the hobby who see it as nothing but a tool to push their political agenda.
EDIT: Link to a mirror that doesn't require logging in to view replies
le illiterate
she was a slave from the 1800s who are these morons dunking on
“I’ve played every civ game” no you haven’t.
I've played 2, 3, 5 and 6. Never played Civ 1 or Civ 4.
My biggest gripe is not enough USSR leaders
missed the one civ with a USSR leader lol
1 has Stalin, 4 has Stalin and Mao
lmao OP missed em both
just my luck
Missed out on Stalin and Mao in Civ4
load more comments
(10 replies)
Sometimes I remember I'm not entirely unintelligent. Reading these comments really reminds you of the utter smoothness of most westerners brains
It’s even a joke I have with myself. One second this is my internal monologue:
“Oh come on, Zinn. You should feel lucky material conditions happened the way they did where you found the left before fascism found you! You’re not immune to propaganda, you got lucky it’s not your big brain!”
Reads a comment section
“On second thought, maybe it is your big brain that allows you to handle the truth.”
new civ announced
I don't wanna play these games anymore
it's part of the culture war now
I don't wanna play these games anymore
speak for yourself, civ rocks and it's been 8.5 years since the last one
Jesus it's been civ 6 for that long?
Civ 6 so old Luigi Mangione an intern at Paradox working on it. 
Paradox doesn’t make Civ, Firaxis does
fuck civ 7 I'm not playing a game made by people who didn't kill a CEO
"oh but if i said hitler should be a leader in civ then i would be called a nazi. ok i see how it is. still waiting for my white privilege check"
Big news for people with enough time and money to play civ 7
Ok, Harriet Tubman is great, but I'm still not playing as Amerikkka when 
is right there.
leaders are detached from civs this go round, so you could have china ruled by tubman
Oh wait, that's awesome. Sounds pretty cool, can't wait to pirate it.
load more comments
(4 replies)
So Harriet and her armies can siege slaver forts with paratroopers and modern armor or something?
Okay they've got my attention. ~Like,~ ~all~ ~of~ ~it.~
view more: next ›