this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
212 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
822 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 75 points 1 year ago (5 children)

F's in chat for our comrades with aphantasia who cannot rotate a cow in their mind.

[–] NoGodsNoMasters@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sadly I can't rotate a cow in my mind because it always just wants to dance to that Polish song instead

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 69 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Some people don't have a voice in their head either. Like that inner-monologue that is explaining your thoughts

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's wild that some people don't have a little David Attenborough in their head that narrates what they do like an anthropologist angel on their shoulder. Like their lives aren't an extended nature documentary where they live at the mercy of the narrative's critique and plotline. They don't even mentally see things from interesting camera angles that advance mental cinematography, it's just flat and their own thoughts.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

One of my favorite weird scientific theories says that prior to a few thousand years ago, this internal narrative voice was mistaken for the voice of the gods, and explains why so many old texts are full of gods saying and doing things with people. The theory says that as we became fully conscious in the way that modern humans are, this narrator--which is actually the linguistic centers in the left hemisphere--finished integrating into the rest of the brain, and we started recognizing that it was actually just our internal monologue, not the gods; this was supposed to be the catalyst for modern human mentality.

It's almost certainly false and pretty fringe, but I've always really loved it as a theory. It's called "the bicameral mind."

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you have a narrator voice in your head?

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago

I awoke several hours later in a daze...

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Narrator: They don't

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, but they still have the theme music, right?

... right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Ok so I can produce a voice in my head, on purpose. But it's not prattling on endlessly. Does it do that for some people?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually literally have an apple for a brain so I am definitely 1

[–] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually literally have an apple for a brain

The first step towards liberalism

[–] echognomics@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Apple-brain syndrome would explain the existence of liberal brainworms

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh neat according to this I'm a 1.

Give me praise. Compliments immediately. You have no idea how apple that apple in my mind looks.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago
[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

This whole discussion is fucked, everyone is using the word "see" differently because our language is not built to talk about mental abstractions.

You know how schizophrenia can make you see things and people? Can you experience the visual effects schizophrenia at will? If you said you are a "1", is that what you mean by "1", or is it, in some way, different than that?

If it is different than that, at all, other people who have the same perception as you are imagining that you can trigger literal hallucinations.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Okay, so I had aphantasia before my TBI and afterwards I could literally picture things in my mind. It's wild. You don't hallucinate the picture per se, but the imagined sensation really is like seeing a picture in your mind.

Imagine the feeling of seeing something. You get the same feeling when imagining a picture of it. You can examine the picture and look at it from different angles and perspectives, but like, there isn't literally a ghost image floating around your head like a cartoon. It just feels like seeing.

It's almost like lucid dreaming while awake? You know it's in your mind and not real, even if you also feel like you see it.

idk you'd think having lived on both sides of the fence I could explain it but this probably sounds fucking bizarre to you lol

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I simply directly access the Platonic Forms with my brain. These 1-5 visualizations are pale imitation of the Form of Appleness. galaxy-brain

[–] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

im currently visualizing a purple apple thats rotating along alternating axes. now a worm is emerging from it and he has a gun. aphantasia havers get owned

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are people who can't visualize things mentally? Are they surprised by the brand new Vista every time they turn a corner? How would one recognize things without it being written down?

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Wait. I'm a 1. I didn't know there were people that can't visualize.

I mean, it makes sense I guess. Vision isn't the only way to perceive something. Feelings, sounds, smells etc are just as valid.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's more interesting about this to me is... This man writes novels. I've always experienced fiction as a "Movie in my head" kind of experience. When I get really into a book, the world around me falls away, and I feel very literally in the narrative.

So how does one experience a novel, if they can't visualize the story in their mind?

[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's another mind fuck: you don't need to internally verbalize to have thoughts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I love asking people about this. Both whether they have an inner monologue or whether they're able to visualize things. It's always fascinated me. It's something we take for granted. I have an inner monologue I can't turn off, and I'm definitely a 2 or 1 depending on how tired I am. Being a 5 on this scale is called "aphantasia"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

It takes servere, concerted effort to visualize stuff. I'm limited to primitive shapes and distinct things I've already seen before

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't imagine not being able to see something in my mind. There's plenty of times where I don't visualize, but I can scale things as needed. I can see myself interacting with an apple in the kitchen, or have it be interacted with without objects (e.g. watch it rot on a blank background, or hyperlapse of it rotting on the ground with bugs and everything), I can watch myself eat it and sense the taste internally. I can even see it in front of me in my minds eye like an overlay - my eyes don't see it, but my mind can like augmented reality.

Stands to reason that I'm very good at building and repairing things, I'm decent at art too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raven@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I used to be a 3-4 but with the help of having used weed just a few times I'm capable of 2 most days. stalin-smokin

Edit: By this I mean I'm always capable of a 2, even when sober, which I usually am. THC fixed my brain or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] edge@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm a definite 5 and I completely agree with him on that. I feel like I'm missing out on so much by not being able to visualize like that.

Interesting that a popular fiction author is aphantasiac, I wonder how visually descriptive his writing is considering afaik descriptive writing like that is usually meant to elicit visualization.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My mental mindscape has everything. Narrator, mind's eye, high-level concepts conceptually connected like a mesh, everything. My mindscape is a chaotic ocean of sensory inputs, memories, raw emotions, and high-level concepts. I'm always a bit surprised when someone is missing a part.

When someone says "apple," I think about the color red, the tartness of the skin, the sweetness and sourness of an apple, the sound of the crunch, oranges-as-a-concept-not-as-a-visual (from apples and oranges), Isaac Newton, apple pie, the pixelated apple tree from Stardew Valley because I don't have good visual memory of apple trees in real life, that time I drank apple cider during Thanksgiving after eating apple pie, how "an apple" used to be "a napple" before the "n" shifted away from the word, how I don't pronounce the "l" in apple, but treat it like a vowel so "apple" sounds like "apo."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

John green is a lib

John green dont see apple

Therefore If you dont see apple youre a lib

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M68040@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can but everything is deliberately stylized as CGI wireframes because I am a hotbed of strange habits

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a three. Whenever I visualise food I see it in black and white while hearing a 1950's Atlantic accent newsreel voice talking about the words/ideas/feeling associated with that food.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This thread is going to invoke the psy-wars and I stand by my apple seeing comrades

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I guess I'm like a 3 or 4? When asked to visualize an apple or a cow or a campfire or something, I can kinda manage it but only for a split second. I can't just hold an image there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Pretty sure you can train and improve this. I don't think it's a skill that you either have or do not have, I don't think the mind is a fixed thing. Much like muscles they can be exercised, trained and rewired. With the right practice drills and routine I'm fairly sure that you could change this in a person, although I'm not sure exactly what drills or routine you'd do for it. Our minds are really moldable and none of this stuff should be viewed as fixed, much like playing an instrument isn't an inherent skill you either have or do not have, it's something you can learn and improve in.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mr_satan@monyet.cc 17 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Besides beiing able to "see" most people have a inner voice that says things "out loud".

Now I'll give you one better, apparently there's levels to this too. One day I surprised my partner by saying that I can "hear" my throughts in any voice I wish, even accent (provided I know such accent).

Like when I remember or imagine anthing I have full visuals and audio. I still lack skill to acually articulate any of these things, so I still suck at pretty much everything I haven't practiced a lot.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›