155
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 105 points 1 year ago

The difference is that China did it to their own people

The classic Nazi talking point, I love this one!

Stalin is worse than Hitler because Stalin killed his own people! sus-soviet

Also the PRC was founded in 1949, I really don't understand how someone can bring up the Mongol Empire and link that to Mao Zedong.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

The classic Nazi talking point, I love this one!

Umm achually they identify as a socialist, they're just "anti-authoritarian". You tankies wouldn't understandsmuglord

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

There total lack of coherence is giving me a headache

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 84 points 1 year ago

"People" vs "your own people".

Oh yeah it's that liberal thought cliche where the lives of people in other countries don't matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 83 points 1 year ago

They were driven out

They were killed. It's crazy how genocide enjoyers will sneak in the subtlest genocide apologia every chance they get.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 71 points 1 year ago

Erm, yikes! I'm pretty sure that's not true. This is what we learned in history class:

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's fake right? This isn't really a children's schoolbook, right?

Though as an Australian, we're taught that our country was "uninhabited" and the Aboriginals "didn't use most of the land and left it for the settlers." So...yeah, we've probably got a couple of these books floating around here too.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"First Nations" suggests this is a Canadian text book of some kind, and given that they're currently engaged in at least one "land dispute" that would be a war of aggression if international law was good for anything other than toilet paper, and a number of other disputes with First Nations people, I'd say this might be real.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

Protection from what? WHAT DID THEY NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM? honk-enraged

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The people telling you communism goes against human nature also tell you it's human nature for a nation to slaughter people for land. Just normal human nature shit.

Jesus what a fucking terrible argument. I'm sure the native americans were just happy white people weren't killing other white people. "At least it's intentional," they thought as they were being driven from their land.

[-] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every time I hear someone try to claim things are human nature (greed, cruelty, selfishness, etc) I just interpret it as a confession of that person having those traits and an attempt to project that unto the rest of society to feel better about it.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

One thing I like to do to really leave the libs shooketh to deconstruct that argument of "But greed will always be a part of humanity!!" is by telling them that if we look over history, murder has always been a feature of humanity.

But do we award the murderers with the most money, political power, and prestige in society? (I know exactly where your mind goes to when I say this but stick with me for a minute and remember that this is when I'm talking on the role of Lib Whisperer.) Or as a society do we actively take steps to mitigate the murderous impulses of humanity by disincentivising it, condemning it, and punishing those who commit murder?

Why then would you do something different with a negative and destructive impulse like greed? Why would you reward it, encourage it, and give the most political power and the most prestige to the greediest people in society?

Who would want to live in that sort of world?

If they object to this notion because they are suffering from a deficit of imagination, you can point to the potlatch ceremony, in which certain societies would give the most prestige in their communities to the people who gave the most to the community in these ceremonies, where people would sometimes even effectively bankrupt themselves in the pursuit of prestige within their communities.

I usually tell a person like that they should stop making pronouncements about all of humanity because they've clearly never stepped outside their comfortable little bubble long enough to realise that, shockingly, different societies do things differently and whatever they say about humanity is just a reflection of their own narrow cultural biases.

[-] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But do we award the murderers with the most money, political power, and prestige in society?

But murder is bad, with greed I'm just exercising my natural right to private property smuglord

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 75 points 1 year ago

We fuckin tried to be diplomatic with these people and they called me a Nazi so now you all have our blessing to go forth and dunk

Fuck these fucking people.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 71 points 1 year ago

They seem to think that being an Anarchist just means being anti-communist. To the point that they are literally parroting fascist taking points about "our people". As if Jackson killing millions of Native Americans to steal their land is somehow not as bad as mismanagement of agricultural policy during a drought/famine? Because Jackson only oppressed the other right. Because a leader's job isn't to build a better world by harnessing the labor and skills of all people, but to either exterminate the other to protect their own or liquidate nature and the proletariat for profit

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 65 points 1 year ago

Every radlib thinks they got it all figured out til an actual anarchist shows up and then they all suddenly turn into Nazis

[-] Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago

An an ML, I want to say I genuinely feel bad that Anarchists have to deal with this bullshit. Like, I can't imagine being an Anarchist and having so many illiterate liberals claim their ideology while spewing reprehensible, absurd bullshit. Anarchists are comrades I respect and have principled disagreements with, but these guys? What the fuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 72 points 1 year ago

"The native American Genocide wasn't that bad, because they weren't considered human"

[-] AbbysMuscles@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sincere post - am I doing something harmful to myself or my psyche? Am I being too insular in staying away from the mental sewer pipes of reddit-logo, twitter, etc in search of places where I don't see this shit? Should I desensitize myself a little to people like this? Because I tend to avoid people like this. In real life, I'm careful to only stay close with people who are, at their core, kind and loving and empathic. I also do this online.

I hate this person. I truly do, and every other sniveling, servile, cowardly, shithead like them. I don't like hating this person, and I don't like hating people at all. I'll always hate porky-happy, but it's no moral crime to hate your oppressor. For this person, my hatred feels more real and visceral and it makes me uncomfortable.

A few years ago I visited White Sands National Park. To get there I had to drive through Alamogordo, a town that seems to mostly exist to service the nearby air force base. On the main tourist track that leads to the park, I passed a kind of mini strip mall set up alongside the road. It was all run-down buildings or shacks or roadside tents covered in native American symbolism with shitty names that I don't care to repeat, selling trinkets and baubles. The people working there all looked, at a glance, to be native American as well. An entire culture reduced to selling bits of "authentic Indian silver" or whatever to scratch out a living. The survivors of a genocide trying to make some money off of the bits of their culture that can be commodified. This is my first time ever discussing that sight, and it's still hard to articulate it. The feeling was so heavy, so suffocating, such a powerful sense of wrongness and injustice that it defies my limited powers of this language to communicate. An entire continent of people - dozens of cultures and languages and histories and peoples slaughtered and displaced and deposited at the edges of a new society that would prefer them gone and relegated to black-and-white photos.

So, GBU_28 is trying to handwave away what America did because Ghengis Khan did it as well. Native Americans weren't "noble savages" by any means. I'm sure they fought and inflicted cruelty and callousness on their fellow man just as all peoples have done. But we stole this place. In its entirety. This entire nation, as well as its equally savage brother-country to the north, ground up the first peoples' bones to use in the foundational concrete. Mods remove this if it's too much, but I truly hope that GBU_28 suffers in this life. I'm fully convinced that this person who I've never met and I never will should truly be subject to the worst agonies and miseries conceivable by the human mind. No physical or emotional torment could compare with what they're trying to "yada yada yada" away.

It can't be good for me.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] honeynut@lemm.ee 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The whole "Manifest Destiny is innocent because colonialism is just human nature" is very popular with Amerikkkans. I've heard this same shit from grade school to the workplace.

They fucking love essentializing their national crimes as products of evolutionary behavior so they can pat themselves on the back for "overcoming" their "natural" urges while being flabbergasted about the oppressed for wanting accountability from the still existing regime that perpetrated it (and still is!).

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US is what would happen if Nazi Germany survived for over 200 years.

We have the same continuous government that did ALL of those things. There has NEVER been a cleaning of house.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 70 points 1 year ago

Is this guy implying that Genghis Khan...conquered land on behalf of China? Am I reading that right? Are they seriously that historically illiterate?

I guess it's not an accident. This is deliberate.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess if you stuck your head up your own ass until you turned yourself inside out you could say that modern China is somehow a successor state of the Mongolian Yuan state? And that... uh... somehow... the Song, and Ming states... did imperialism? And that Mao did an imperialism because.... the Yuan dynasty...

I'm sorry I'm trying real hard but I can't pull any kind of sense out of that.

Is this what NATOnauts are telling themselves about how the world works to justify provocations against China? I can't tell what is the work of one crank or the work of large numbers of cranks anymore.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 51 points 1 year ago

Ah, we've been bamboozled. We're looking at it backwards.

You see, China bad. Mao bad man. These are the facts, the Truth. Now we just need to work backwards to find out ways China is bad and Mao is bad. I heard Mao smoked cigarettes, which is very uncouth behaviour. And he smoked them in China. Clearly he was hoping the secondhand smoke would kill millions! What an evil guy!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago

That is just open white nationalism and genocide denial

It is interesting tho watching how desperately fascists try to appropriate our terminology despite how they wield it so incoherently

Shows the inherent weakness of their positions and politics, they have nothing except what they can take from us

[-] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 58 points 1 year ago

its really funny how libs alternate between "im just a smol bean, tankies are such meanies" and Reinhard Heydrich depending on what they are talking about

[-] dinklesplein@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago

'whataboutism' LMAO i literally havent heard an original critique from liberals for at least two years at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

As a person of NATO, Andrew Jackson is allowed to order the ethnic cleansing of Indigenous peoples. People of NATO being able to steal land from Indigenous peoples is allowed because people of NATO are justifiably hierarchically over Indigenous peoples. I'm definitely an anarchist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago

You know they're right, we should hold the definitely still existing Golden Horde accountable for the actions of Chingis Khan. I'll drive down to Ulaanbaatar and throw red paint on the giant statue right away (I would never do this the Mongolians are cool people and that statue owns.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, Han Chinese people colonised themselves. I am very smart.

[-] Zodiark@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago

why isn't this creep banished from hexbear yet

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So is 196 just /r/neoliberal2.0? Why did we fedposting erate again?

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

@GBU_28@lemm.ee

You make some good points about how Andrew Jackson killed only in defense of his own people. Reminds me of this book written by Andolfo Hütlie.

You might be interested in checking it out if you want to understand more about the necessity of the Trail of Tears in the development of America's big beautiful strip malls and suburbs.

load more comments (75 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
155 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
345 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS