this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
109 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
805 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everything coming out of their mouths, their actions…like, this all seems like self sabotage? Campaigning in Michigan with Cheney, ‘what happened on October 7th is so much worse than the genocide in Gaza’, ‘the empathy we did not display towards gaza doesn’t mean we support Gaza’.

Sub zero intelligence in that campaign/party or are they actively campaigning to lose? It’s a train wreck lmaoo

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 55 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lose what?

Thanks to Trump, they have exactly one opportunity to court the Reaganites and the Cheneys (and soon the Bushes). The establishment Republicans. This is what the Democrats have been dreaming for decades, and Trump pissing off all these factions have made it possible for the Democrats to seize upon this moment.

Might they be losing voters, yes, but who cares? The donor class is the only class that matters.

Because of Citizens United, prioritizing the donor class means endless funding for future campaigns, while the Republican Party is being relegated to a MAGA culture war party that will soon succumb to its own fracture from internal divisions.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The people in the campaign staff and WH staff are all so far removed from normal people and normal competency that this is where we are. This is also, for example, why the White House keeps asking China to do stuff that doesn't benefit China, and it's why they're staggered every time China says no.

[–] fox@hexbear.net 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"We're putting a moratorium on doing any space science with you, we will never cooperate."

"Ok, we'll make our own space station then. By the way, we just brought back some moon rocks from our moon return mission."

"Oh cool! Please share them with us. We're not making an exception to the moratorium and will not share whatever we learn with you. Fuck you."

"Nah we're not gonna do that."

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

"Nah we're not gonna do that."

porky-point

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 44 points 3 weeks ago

They don't care about winning, they care about donors

[–] RION@hexbear.net 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Until recently I would've said this is ridiculous to the point of hyperbole

Then I watched her try to invoke Oct. 7th to justify genocide when directly asked about losing Arab and Muslim support over it

Then I saw she sent Ritchie Torres to stump in Michigan

If it's not on purpose it's some of the worst self-sabotage I've ever seen

[–] Poison_Ivy@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago

Then I saw she sent Ritchie Torres to stump in Michigan

Lmao what the fuck

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

They must think it's worth completely alienating the Muslim vote to hold onto the Zionist pro-burning-people-alive caucus in these states. After all, more people are bloodthirsty racist monsters than not. They're probably doing the "right" thing to win this election internet-delenda-est

[–] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think that they would like to win, but don't know what is broadly popular and are constrained by the donors and by wanting to turn the Dem party into the 2006-era GW Bush Republican party.

Obviously you can do all that and still run a good campaign by just lying about it, like Obama for example. A Dem party with better PR would still adopt all the Liz/Dick Cheney policy positions, but wouldn't constantly talk about how much they love them.

Also, there are a bunch of consultants who will get paid either way, those people probably don't care about winning at all.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

I've seen someone else on the site, I think z poster?, makes the comment that the reason that they can't lie or even be subtle, is that Israel freaks out so badly anytime they say anything that could even be interpreted as not getting full support to the genocide.

Understandably people keep asking them questions about this topic, and the correct move would be to be evasive, or just lie, but they aren't able to.

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think they can lie about not supporting Israel because it makes Israel lose face

Edit: someone else has the same idea as me

[–] ComradeMonotreme@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think they want to lose, as much as they only want to win one way, through a centrist/neoliberal consensus without a single concession to left/social democracy/populism etc, and if they lose the voters failed them, not the other way around.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. There is literally nothing democrats love more than losing elections to easily beatable Republicans.

They aren't expected to actually do anything so they can keep claiming to be super progressive and they can say "told you so" and punch left to blame progressives.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

They're not pretending to be "progressive" at all this election. They're literally taking up right wing positions on immigration, police, climate, putting fucking Republicans in the cabinet...

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Believe a lot of Biden's campaign team is working for KKKamala now, gotta assume it's the same people who thought putting Biden on live TV at 9pm was a good idea.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

Don't forget that Hillary is advising and they probably have a lot of former Hillary staffers. That's why they're pulling a page out of the 2016 Hilldawg book and not sending Kamala to the battleground states she's losing, instead for example having a rally in Houston, Texas this Friday: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/election/2024/article/kamala-harris-houston-rally-19853754.php

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah they're running a West Wing campaign in 2024. Liberals are pure narrativists and will do anything, even fascism, to keep the narrative going. They cannot cope with the story they're living going wrong

[–] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 3 weeks ago

The opposition party needs to be full of useful idiots, who will do whatever they're told no matter what it costs their credibility. It's an entire party of clueless.

[–] Ericthescruffy@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Its jaw dropping and I've been confused also but I THINK in my limited layman's opinion they WANT to win...but only if it can be on their specific terms.

Like with Israel...I think they may be in a bit of a quagmire. I think they are aware the genocide is broadly unpopular but the problem is that they also fundamentally agree with the zionist agenda and can't decouple themselves from it. Its a bit shocking how they won't even bother to lie about it...but I think they've gamed it out and decided that politically its actually more dangerous/volatile to risk completely ceding that ground to the republicans.

With the Cheney's....I don't know...I'd be curious what polls show because just anecdotally I know my grandparents and a lot of their Reagan era republican friends who switched during the Obama years fucking love her.

Speculation: they may be primarily motivated to focus exclusively on that voting bloc because they don't actually expect the democrats to do anything different or material???

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I don’t know how I can simultaneously want them to lose and also be mad that they are fucking trying to eat it this badly and in this particular way. Not looking forward to Like two more weeks of intense loathing. The loathing will continue after as well but holy shit this campaign sucks.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

They accuse us of wanting a Trump presidency so often, but it would honestly make my life so much less stressful if I did

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In a perfect world, democrats would lose to an explicitly Marxist organization who takes all 50 states' electoral votes, every seat in the house and senate, then get thrown in prison for their crimes. The seething from libs would be glorious when they realize the rest of their life will be behind bars all because they supported Isreal instead of voters' demands.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Libs would be clamouring for a Fascist coup if there was even a breath of possibility that would happen.

their defenders really do get exactly the party they deserve. it's little comfort for the rest of us.

[–] Pastaguini@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

I think what they want is a very specific outcome, and they would prefer to be the ones that bring it into existence, but they’re also ok with the other party doing it as long as the outcome is achieved. They want to win, but they’re ok with losing if it means the larger project remains on the rails.

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think so. They are technocratic institutionalists through and through, and Trump is a threat to the stability of these institutions. This is what it looks like when the Democrats are TRYING to win. They just have absolutely run out of gas.

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It could easily just be incompetence. Kamala bombed out of the 2020 primaries before they even began despite being the media darling who was hyped up as the front-runner, then was handed the nomination this cycle through shennaniganry. She has pretty terrible political instincts, if we wanted to be extremely generous we could say she's "unproven." It would not be at all surprising if she bombs out, they shoulda had a primary so they could find someone who at least knows what they're doing.

[–] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yeah to put it into perspective, she was coming in behind Andrew Yang in her home state of California where she was the sitting senator.

For a moment I felt I had underestimated her when she started garnering wider support after picking the least ghoulish ghoul to be her VP, but now it's clear she's increasingly cooked the more people get to know her whereas Trump is a known quantity.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Even in the first half of Biden's term, she didn't have much public interaction. There was that bizarre video of people asking her questions and she responded with "Your opinion, your voice," or some stupid focus group shit like that. Then she starts laughing and giggling. It was like she was high on prescription medications.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

picking the least ghoulish ghoul to be her VP

Wait do you want to tell me that there really isn't anyone less ghoulish in the upper ranks of entire dem party than "Greater Israel" Walz?

[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

The bar is low and Walz gave free lunches to students. He also vetoed a bill that gave more rights to Uber drivers.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

Nope, everyone to the left is ostracised.

[–] LeZero@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

What I've seen from the outside was that Josh Shapiro was the most likely pick...

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

‘what happened on October 7th is so much worse than the genocide in Gaza’

I missed that one, when did that happen?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Ah okay so it wasn't an exact quote, makes sense. I was surprised that she would have said something so clearly instead of doing the usual politicianspeak. Good to know my instincts are still correct lol

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

No! It's no like bernie is the candidate, they want to win, they want to win super heard, if you're thinking they don't want to win because they'd have to move to the left to do so that just means they're not willing to do that to win

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

All they have to do is lie! Say they'll stop and then hide it in the black budget. Or hell just say "Soz the parlimentarian forced us to ramp it up 300% actually"

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm pretty certain it's not that they want to lose, but that they think they've already won. Kamala appeals to everyone Joe does, and she's a black woman! In their eyes, they've hit the candidate jackpot, locking in the progressive vote without having to change course and introduce progressive policies.

It's Hillary all over again.

[–] micnd90@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Why would a lifestyle brand (TM) co -op want to run a government?

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. Maybe they don't think so, but I genuinely believe the Dems don't want to win because their entire schtick is to make a bunch of money whilst the unpopulars do their dirty work

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

I thought Trump was playing the heel so dems could win since they're both on the same MiC-fed-capital side anyway but it could be the other way around