this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
197 points (99.5% liked)

traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

1084 readers
253 users here now

Welcome to /c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns, an anti-capitalist meme community for transgender and gender diverse people.

  1. Please follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct

  2. Selfies are not permitted for the personal safety of users.

  3. No personal identifying information may be posted or commented.

  4. Stay on topic (trans/gender stuff).

  5. Bring a trans friend!

  6. Any image post that gets 200 upvotes with "banner" or "rule 6" in the title becomes the new banner.

  7. Posts about dysphoria/trauma/transphobia should be NSFW tagged for community health purposes.

  8. When made outside of NSFW tagged posts, comments about dysphoria/traumatic/transphobic material should be spoiler tagged.

  9. Arguing in favor of transmedicalism is unacceptable. This is an inclusive and intersectional community.

  10. While this is mostly a meme community, we allow most trans related posts as we grow the trans community on the fediverse.

If you need your neopronouns added to the list, please contact the site admins.

Remember to report rulebreaking posts, don't assume someone else has already done it!

Matrix Group Chat:

Suggested Matrix Client: Cinny

https://rentry.co/tracha (Includes rules and invite link)

WEBRINGS:

🏳️‍⚧️ Transmasculine Pride Ring 🏳️‍⚧️

⬅️ Left 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Be Crime Do Gay Webring 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Right ➡️

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What show is the vampire one?

[–] Carcharodonna@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

I think it’s “Vampire Knight”

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Took me a while to get this one

[–] miz@hexbear.net 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

incredible contributions to literature

limmy-what

who else could have come up with names like "Cho Chang" or thought of loading up banking goblins with antisemitic tropes

[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or making the only Irish character a pyromanic, mere years after the end of The Troubles

[–] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or saying in an interview "the werewolves can be seen as an allegory for gay people and how they were treated during the AIDS epidemic", then making the leader of the werewolves in her next book a literal groomer who deliberately infects young boys with lycanthropy

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or implementing chattel slavery into it, then making it institutionalized in such a way that 99% of the cast ridicules the only person that wanted to do anything about it

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 52 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Transphobia aside (I can't believe I'm saying this) what contributions to literature? I'm not the most well read person, but even I know that everything JKR has written is drivel: racist, homophobic, antisemitic garbage that's as devoid of literary value as advertisement copy.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

She made a lot of money for investors.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think one could argue that the HP books got kids to read more but I don't know to what extent that's true, and that's still easily counteracted by all the harm she has done with the profits of her book sales. In terms of actually "contributions to literature", IIRC even most of her fans agree that everything after the third book is pretty shit.

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago

If one were to argue such, I would say it was a very poor argument. There were plenty of other, quality fantasy series out that were targeting the same age group at the time her books were being written. The genre was slightly novel and it was just pushed on kids at school as the new shiny series.

[–] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think one could argue that the HP books got kids to read more but I don't know to what extent that's true

What got kids into it was the international PR campaign for the Harry Potter series. This shit was marketed hard back in the day, and "Harry Potter gets kids to read books again!" was a core selling point in that.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’ll admit it, they were fun books to read back when I was a young shithead. I’d wait for their release with bated breath.

I mean, yeah, dumb as fuck in retrospect especially considering all the insane things she’s said but they were the definition of easy read page turners for kids, like Boxcar children.

Wish I could say I was weaving through House of Leaves at the age of 10 but it’s not my fault, blame my parentsshrug-outta-hecks

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really want to see a House of Leaves movie or TV series, but I don't know that it'd work. Part of that book's experience is the fourth wall breaks and how the text itself becomes another puzzle. It's almost like a graphic novel (literally) with how the words turn into images or how they're organized on the page. I think the closest I've seen to anyone else doing this is Vonnegut and comic books have played with fonts/typography for as long as they've been around.

You would have a hard time re-creating this effect visually. I think they could try doing something fuckery like Bandersnatch on Netflix that was an interactive movie. Like watching House of Leaves messes with your TV.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

I think they could try doing something fuckery like Bandersnatch on Netflix that was an interactive movie.

That would be reallh interesting. Or maybe a point and click video game would be a good format

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think the whole “it got kids to read” marketing point was just based on sales data. People have been bemoaning each generation reading less and seeing Harry Potter’s numbers at the time probably gave the impression that it “saved” literature.

I still stand that the first three books were good and the series could have held up better if it maintained the same level of quality. Goblet of Fire is where it all goes to shit. Every single complaint about the series that I’ve seen from Cho Chang to the elves liking slavery is from Goblet of Fire and every book after that.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Third one is the one with the time travel, which creates a bunch of plotholes

[–] lil_tank@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even outside of reactionary garbage it's definitely not great literature

It's not even good children's literature. Unfortunately these days seems most of it is terrible.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s mid for sure. Lots of better kids books out there in terms of both literary quality and entertainment. As a kid I read them (obligatory for any kid who read a lot in my generation) but there weren’t even in my top 10 book series.

I preferred Artemis Fowl, Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit, Series of Unfortunate Events, Bartimaeus Trilogy, Redwall series, Animorphs, Chronicles of Narnia, the Eragon series (not great literary quality but I still liked it), Ender’s Game series (good quality but another questionable crank author).

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wasn't the author in like his teens when Eragon started? I haven't read passed the third book, and its been ages since even that, but I feel like younger authors can get a bit of slack, especially with an attempt at a fantasy epic.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Yes he was like 17. It gets a lot of hate because of its juvenile prose and derivative plot and setting, but it does the job at the end of the day of being enthralling to its target demographic.

[–] Carcharodonna@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah it's ridiculous. She's terrible and her books are terrible.

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's ok to have never read any of the Harry Potter books

[–] Carcharodonna@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

I’m glad I never read any of them, or saw any of the movies, or played any HP games. I feel vindicated for having avoided that.

[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're gonna turn her into a statue?!?!?!

Like one of those monks?!?!?

Go for it! How long has she been eating the pine resin and stuff? We don't have to wait long do we?

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

Given that she's also a kook, I wouldn't doubt this is actually happening