153
Nate Plastic (hexbear.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] frostprophet@infosec.pub 82 points 4 months ago

I grew up and lost all respect for Nate over something really trivial that made me realize he was full of BS. He said imperial measurements are better because you could say you ran "4 miles", he said saying you ran 3.2km would just sound stupid so why would you want metric? Does he think people in countries that use metric are agonising over having to round distances (just like imperial would the majority of the time) or wish they could express it in miles? Does he always run in exact mile increments every single time? Rant over but it made me irrationally mad. He might have been joking but didn't care enough to find out.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 54 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Using larger units means you're more likely to have to resort to fractions lmao, I wish shit here was measured in mm and ml/mg instead of fucking fractional inches and decimal ounces.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 42 points 4 months ago

i think its really funny that in some engineering domains we use "mils," meaning milli-inches.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 36 points 4 months ago

The most cursed unit of measurement.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago
[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago
[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago

for the sake of my file at langley, i am not an engineer, i just dabble in circuit design

[-] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 4 months ago

Imperial is better. Everybody else has to say "I'm 2.54 centimetreing forward." Americans just say "I'm inching forward." That's obviously better.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago

Ahhh imperial, the system that uses the same metric to measure volume and weight and half the time people forget to specify which kind they're talking about.

[-] bunnygirl@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago

I think it's clear what the superior system is

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

I was so worried before noticing it's satire lol.

[-] Krem@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago

hell yeah saying "8 3/5ths cubic inches" makes you sond really smart, and having to use a calculator to convert to the next step (2 1/3rd cubic feet) is not supid at all

[-] niph@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

I recently found out about the “acre foot” as a volumetric measurement and instantly died at the stupidity

[-] gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

Na that makes perfect sense for what i assume to be the intended use - measuring the amount of soil you have.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 72 points 4 months ago

Guessed correctly one (1) time and built a decade-long career on it despite never coming even close again

[-] the_itsb@hexbear.net 44 points 4 months ago

I was coming to the comments to ask if I was wrong about this guy and if he had actually been right more than that one single time

taking this as confirmation that I correctly remembered him as an arrogant dumbass

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 36 points 4 months ago

tbh he was probably not far off other statistical analysis in the past but I recall that on the 2020 election his website was extremely wrong

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

I remember on the morning of the 2016 election, his dip shit voting science site said Clinton had a 93% chance of winning.

[-] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ok so this is weird revisionism, because I remember 538 was the least bullish on Clinton the entire time. The pre election podcast had her odds at 70% or something, which was way better than NYT, etc.

Not to say Nate was "right" about 2016, but compared to other outlets, his actually was closer to the statistical average.

The 93% might have been one of the forecast models, but the day of the election it was only 71.

He still sucks, but he was actually better than other pundits in 2016. They actually got tons of shit from libs because they couldn't comprehend that Trump had 1/3 odds

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

this is also my recollection. i was checking that shit weekly. i didn't want hillary to win, but her losing to such an obviously awful candidate seemed so unbelievable that the odds they were giving were incomprehensible to me.

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

and even if it said 99% that doesn't necessarily mean the model was wrong. Sometimes you roll a 1 but the odds of rolling not-1 are still 95% or 83⅓% or whatever

fuck nate but also most of us, including me, don't have math expertise

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 38 points 4 months ago

And I believed it because the Adults In The Room knew What They Were Doing.

8 years later I'm a rabid communist who counts down the hours until the West collapses

[-] SaniFlush@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago

We've been waiting for nearly a century now

[-] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 months ago

Sure he’s been right multiple times. He calls races in winner-take-all elections in the US.

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 60 points 4 months ago

Hi Nate, there are over 50 universities protesting now. Last I checked, 50 does not equal 8, but unlike you I'm not the Math Expert so maybe I am wrong.

[-] mar_k@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago

That's only the number of universities with tent encampments. My uni doesn't have encampments but we've had hundreds protesting and a couple people arrested in the past couple days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 48 points 4 months ago

TIL all American 18-34 year olds are Ivy League college students.

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago

Damn, my Associates is of Ivy calibre.

[-] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 46 points 4 months ago

Love that this dude is living proof that viewing the world as numbers does not make someone smart.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

"You get used to it. I don't even see the numbers. All I see is..." falls of chair smashes head on desk.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 46 points 4 months ago

These fucking Twitter liberals have spent so long arguing against leftists, that they really cannot comprehend the fact that the leftist position on Gaza is entirely mainstream, overwhelmingly popular, dominant. They are the absolute fringe, the weirdo wackos. They are Democrats who are to the right of most Republicans.

[-] mar_k@hexbear.net 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Lmao if you look at the list of universities with pro-Palestinian encampments like half of them are state unis with acceptance rates around 50-90%

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

silver-legion I told the kids thier opinions don't matter. Can I get back in good graces with the establishment my Lords?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 30 points 4 months ago

Is Nate a dipshit or is Nate paid to be a dipshit?

[-] jack@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

You pay someone for what they're good at

[-] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 28 points 4 months ago

xi-plz aim for the new york times for the love of god.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago
[-] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago

nate fuckface

[-] volcel_olive_oil@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

dril the numbers are in, but maybe some $20 dollar words will make them go away

[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

I love how it’s obvious common sense that - as cool as the protests are - you can’t take some 50 protests that involve a relatively small number of people even as a total of the respective student bodies and extrapolate that as indicative of what tens of millions of people in an age cohort think. Literally no one is saying that. But Nate has to add some very technical sounding words to let you know he very smart and is a very big boy who understands everything better than you.

[-] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 4 months ago

How can one hold an entire galaxy in their brain

[-] idkmybffjoeysteel@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

I mean yes, he's right, but not in this context. I don't see any protests at Harvard or Yale or Brown and if I did, they would probably be midnight marches with torches and pointy white hoods. These boys aren't going to sacrifice their future careers in the CIA to attend a Gaza rally.

[-] GrumpigPoopBalls@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

FYI not that I generally disagree with the idea that the average Ivy League student is exactly what you say but there are ongoing pro-Palestine protests/encampments at all three of those universities too

[-] idkmybffjoeysteel@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] macabrett@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago

I'm struck by this passage from Against Empire by Michael Parenti, published 30 years ago:

Mainstream pundits and propagandists label our desire to move away from corporate militarism and imperial domination as weakness, folly, isolationism, or self-defeating pacifism. But there is another name for the course of action that aims to wrest the wealth and power out of the hands of the military-industrial complex and the multinational investor class and give it back to the people so that they can become agents of their own lives and social conditions: it is called democracy, the victory of the republic over empire.

[-] Sushi_Desires@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

Nate Asbestos

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
816 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS